User talk:SEOTech123

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Espresso machine have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Take a look at our guidelines about external links. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Coffee in Italy have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:25, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello SEOTech123. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SEOTech123. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SEOTech123|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:51, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Espresso machine. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Can you suggest some links examples to take as example for external linking, so that i can add proper edits from next time SEOTech123 (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sarsenet. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 12:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:SEOTech123/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 13:52, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:SEOTech123/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on User:SEOTech123/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked. For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 11:59, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I acknowledge that my previous edits did not meet Wikipedia’s standards and gave the appearance of promotional and conflict-of-interest editing. This was a misunderstanding of Wikipedia’s policies, not an attempt to advertise.

I understand that Wikipedia is not a marketing platform, that paid or affiliated editing must be disclosed, and that AI-generated content is not appropriate for article creation. I am willing to follow all relevant policies, including COI, NPOV, and reliable sourcing, and will refrain from editing topics where I may have a conflict of interest.

I respectfully request one opportunity to contribute constructively to non-commercial, neutral topics. SEOTech123 (talk) 05:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I acknowledge that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s policies, particularly regarding external links, promotional content, and conflict of interest. I sincerely apologize for adding spam-like links and for misunderstanding Wikipedia’s purpose and sourcing standards.

I now understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion, marketing, or SEO, and that external links must be strictly encyclopedic, independent, and non-commercial. I also recognize that my editing pattern gave the appearance of promotional intent, which was not appropriate.

I assure you that I will not add promotional or affiliated links again, will avoid editing topics where I may have a conflict of interest, and will follow Wikipedia’s policies on neutral point of view, reliable sourcing, and disclosure. If unblocked, I intend to contribute only in a constructive, non-commercial manner and will use talk pages or Articles for Creation where appropriate.

I respectfully request one opportunity to demonstrate good-faith, policy-compliant editing. SEOTech123 (talk) 06:48, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

You're going to have to use the {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} text as shown above for this unblock request to be seen. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 17:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)