User talk:Sachamcd

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. | MK17b | (talk) 04:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Sachamcd, you are risking a block per this complaint. You are trying to undo the result of a formal WP:Request for comment, in other words you are warring against consensus. There may still be time for you to concede the point if you want to avoid a block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

I am removing material that in MAY 2016 was deemed completely irrelevant to the breadth of his political career and comments which were already disproven in the Canadian Jewish media. ^[1] MK17b has a history of editing jewish propaganda into a host of pages on wikipedia, look at his edit history and this will be evident. I suspect he might be operating under the Jewish Internet Defence force and it is he who should be banned for perpetuating his bias and obvious agenda. I am reenlisting the help of admin Oshwah who back in May 2016 helped reverse some edits made by MK17b. MK17b is trying to ban me because he knows this is the only way for him to get his libel to stick. Please help. Sachamcd (talk) 13:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)Sachamcd

Sachamcd - your accusations toward MK17b are completely unwarranted and absolutely unacceptable per Wikipedia's civility guidelines. Not only have you been engaged in previous edit wars with this user in the recent past, but it appears that you exhibit battleground conduct towards those you disagree with. This behavior needs to stop, dude. Even in your message on my talk page, you state how "the jewish community often adds defamatory information" to articles you edit. Sure, the content I reviewed had questionable sources, and I agreed it should be removed and discussed - that did not mean that you should edit war and ignore others' requests to talk about it. You need to take some time and re-evaluate your behavior and your actions. This pattern of collaboration usually results in community sanctions when editors continue doing so despite being asked to stop. Please think about it, okay? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Sachamcd. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jeremy Searle".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:16, 12 November 2016 (UTC)