Your submission at Articles for creation: Natasha Saunders (April 14)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, ChrysGalley, left the following feedback:
provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Almost all the sourcing here is back to her speakers agency, so much so that it's running very close to being an advertisement, with the promotional tone used here. What this lack is good quality independent sources that describe the subject in detail, sufficient for there to be a basis for summarising in an encyclopedia.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Natasha Saunders to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hello, SRTteam!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 10:46, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
Thank you Chrys. I appreciate your help. I hope these ammendments are more suitable and have enjoyed learning how I can contribute to Wikipedia. SRTteam (talk) 13:15, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Next steps
Edit the draft to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Hello, I have noted and appreciate your helpful comments. I have amended the sources to a variable of independent and reliable news outlets. Best wishes.
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hello, SarahatSRT. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there! Please note that all old questions are archived after 2–3 days of inactivity.Message added by BSH (talk) - (they/them) 13:26, 15 April 2026 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Natasha Saunders (April 15)
Draft declinedThank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
FeedbackThe reviewer, CabinetCavers, left the following feedback:
Draft has not improved since previous decline.
Next steps
Edit Draft:Natasha Saunders to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
all links have been changed from speaker agency referral etc to third party sources and impartial media outlets inline with Wikipedia guidelines. Is it the wording that needs changing also? SRTteam (talk) 14:27, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
April 2026
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.
You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.
To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Before requesting your new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.
The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual:
You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".
If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
