User talk:SavageCelery

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi SavageCelery! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 20:42, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Weber (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by NeoGaze were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like a résumé than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, that provide secondary analysis of the subject's life in context. In contrast, résumés will tend to list individual accomplishments and rely on self-published sources, which might unduly focus on positive events and fail to properly balance their weight. Please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies by using independent, reliable sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft reads more like a résumé than a neutral encyclopedic article. Notability seems lacking, so please provide clear proofs of notability. Also "Early Life and Education" section is completely unsourced.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
NeoGaze (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, SavageCelery! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NeoGaze (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Adam Weber (engineer) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adam Weber (engineer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:03, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI