User talk:Nyxaros
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page! Please do not bring discussions here from other pages. Please use diffs when talking about edits. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on your talk page or a relevant article talk page. I will not continue to watch a talk page if the discussion has migrated. I don't check my watchlist regularly. I don't always add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them, unless it's a user talk page or I started an important discussion. Thank you.
 | Please learn how to write and edit articles first and open discussions in a new section on the talk page of the articles, not here. |
Furiosa
furiosa 2409:408A:8D35:3E31:8F91:5290:494E:4339 (talk) 17:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fury Road is better. ภץאคгöร 18:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silent Hill (film), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramount was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
Seeking support for standardizing the use of posters instead of title cards for miniseries articles
I’m reaching out to get your thoughts on a proposal I’ve made regarding the visual standards for miniseries and limited series articles. Currently, MOS:TVIMAGE allows for either a title card or a promotional poster, but common practice has leaned toward title cards by default. This has led to many miniseries articles only using title cards instead of posters.
I am proposing we standardize the use of promotional posters for miniseries articles. The logic is two-fold:
- Unlike ongoing series, miniseries have no "Season" articles to house their posters. The poster is the only asset that identifies the cast, setting, and genre at a glance—context a text-based title card lacks.
- By standardizing this for miniseries, we remove the need for future "Title Card vs. Poster" discussions like this one.
I’m trying to build consensus to make the guidelines more definitive so editors don't have to keep re-litigating this for other miniseries. If you're interested in supporting this cause, voice out your opinions here. TheVoicelessWriter (talk) 05:11, 25 February 2026 (UTC)
GS/AA
Hi Nyxaros, are you familiar with contentious topics? Barseghian Lilia (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it’s something you should check. We do not remove reliable sources and synthesize info from the already existing references to fit your agenda. One can clearly see that you are violating WP:OR and WP:NPOV already. You are even removing citation needed templates for some reason. ภץאคгöร 13:20, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Regarding the reversion of the Shrek images
With all due respect, the versions of the Shrek 2 and Shrek the Third posters you uploaded in 2020 are of horrible quality, to the point of looking borderline pixellated. Hence why I went and uploaded higher-res images. And before you say they're too big, DatBot automatically reduces the sizes of images to comply with Wikipedia's non-free use policy. JHD0919 (talk) 22:44, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- You clearly don't know what you are talking about. The recent changes made by the community make them look pixelated, this was not the case just up until recently, you can see an archived version of the exact same page here which shows its real quality or you can still see the actual quality here. The quality of the file you uploaded is actually worse, and it would decrease even further when reduced by bot. ภץאคгöร 23:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)