User talk:SemD642

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:George Floyd have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please read the FAQ.  Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 08:21, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

What was not constructive about it? I mentioned the official autopsy report. And explained why its relevant to the wikipedia page. How would you have constructed what I said then? SemD642 (talk) 08:54, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

I find it very concerning that point that follows the 'neutral pov' guidelines gets removed with as reason a criptic message 'not constructive'. This to be honest just feels like you dont like what I represented and removed it for the sake of your own political opinion. Which furthermore makes the argument even further away from 'neutral' and 'objective' SemD642 (talk) 09:24, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

I'll just chime in to say that you got off lightly here. If I had spotted your little rant I would have given you a rather stronger warning. I will remind you that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and that the regulars here are not stupid people. Trying to bulldoze us with counterfactual statements is not going to work. We know when people are wasting our time. Continued disruption can lead to a block from editing. If you want to help us to write an encyclopaedia then please familiarise yourself with our policies and try to contribute constructively, but please understand that if you just want to spout counterfactual claims then Wikipedia is not the website you are looking for. DanielRigal (talk) 17:53, 17 December 2025 (UTC)