User talk:SerpentorC

November 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spanish Cobras, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. IsCat (talk) 19:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Spanish Cobras, you may be blocked from editing. IsCat (talk) 19:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Spanish Cobras. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

I was not vandalizing. I was correcting wrong information and there was a constant deleting by multiple people of my accurate content. If you cross reference with any other official Chicago gang page it will match what I’m writing. I have other verified sources to add. Can I proceed to edit all the incorrect information on the Spanish Cobra page? ~2025-32584-34 (talk) 16:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Can you unblock so I can add the correct information with verified sources. Some of the info is in the References section. Just not cited. I was the one who added the link for recommended reading and one in references. ~2025-32520-20 (talk) 19:19, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Undue block please.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerpentorC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

The information on Spanish Cobra page is wrong. I was an original contributor to the page as a guest years ago and if you look at the history you will see I added to the “introduction”, “territory” and even a reference in the “further reading” section. Someone vandalized the page with wrong info. All I’ve been trying to do is return the correct founding dates and history. SerpentorC (talk) 16:04, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You posted the same information at User talk:Recondo85 and User talk:Outlawloco. You are clearly using multiple accounts, so I am declining this unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SerpentorC (talk) 16:04, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Unblock please. Misunderstanding

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SerpentorC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Review the information please. I can delete the other accounts. Currently there is wrong information on Wikipedia that I am trying to correct. That’s all. I’m new to this and don’t know the exact rules. I have edited as a guest for years but just made my accounts recently. SerpentorC (talk) 18:26, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You can't say on one hand that you've been editing for years, and also that you're "new to this"; it's one or the other. And if you really didn't know that multiple accounts was problematic, you should have concluded that from your first batch of accounts getting blocked, but instead you went ahead and registered a new one; that makes it block evasion, which certainly is problematic. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:32, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SerpentorC (talk) 18:26, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles