User talk:Shqypëtari

Hello, I'm TonySt. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Zojz (deity), but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tony 20:06, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Shqypëtari/Kreja, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:17, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Why is it getting deleted? Nobody would see the page unless they go to my page directly. It’s not meant to be seen by anyone, which is why I made it a user page. Shqypëtari (talk) 23:22, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

We don't allow false information on any namespace, including user space. if you think the page shouldn't be deleted, you are free to contest it. Chess enjoyer (talk) 23:34, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Delete it quickly. It might split wiki in half! Shqypëtari (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

The page Demë Ali Pozhari has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://pashtriku.org/pashtriku-deme-ali-pozhari-nderi-i-kombit/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ^Complex/_Rational 21:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Was it seriously difficult to give time to fix the page before deleting it? Literally what is wrong with you? It is not difficult to say that and give literally just a short amount of time to fix. Shqypëtari (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Copyright infringement is not permitted on Wikipedia, even if you intend to fix it later, as it potentially carries legal implications. Verbatim translation of a copyrighted Albanian source is still copyright infringement. You are free to recreate the page provided you write everything in your own words. ^Complex/_Rational 22:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I rewrote the entire page. Tell me what laws I violated now. Shqypëtari (talk) 23:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

The page Adem Haxhosaj has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.drini.us/adem-haxhosaj-uragani-i-luftes-clirimtare-nga-rrafshi-i-dukagjinit/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Sennecaster (Chat) 22:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

The page Prelë Tuli has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://balkanacademia.com/2025/12/28/prele-tuli-of-merturi-1852-1918/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Sennecaster (Chat) 22:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

The page Elez Geci has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.radiokosovaelire.com/elez-rame-geci-11-2-1951-28-3-1999/ and rest fails verification and would be removed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

The page Ramë Binaku has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://balkanacademia.com/2025/01/29/albanian-hero-rame-binaku-1876-1963-from-dashinoc-and-the-kacak-movement/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sennecaster (Chat) 23:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

The recreation you put of the article contained translated material that matches exactly to https://www.botasot.info/historia-lajme/857344/deme-ali-pozhari-i-pari-i-nacionalisteve-te-dukagjinit/ when machine translated on my browser. What wasn't copied still largely borrows the structure of the content - please read WP:CLOP and our copyright policy very carefully. I blocked you because I and ComplexRational have found multiple articles that were unambiguously copy-pastes created in a very short amount of time. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

This is going extreme, you first of all didn't even warn me of anything and simply went ahead deleting my pages. I rewrote the entire page, rewording it and still you deleted it again and blocked me. I don't know what else you wanted me to do, besides completely ruining the page and putting events in random order. Not only that but first you guys claimed that I copied the other page by Pashtriku, and now Bota Sot? I barely even used the article of Bota Sot to begin with. I added that article as reference only to what I had already written the first time. Shqypëtari (talk) 23:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shqypëtari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Recently I have made a few minor pages on Albanian history, including the short biographies of Ramë Binaku, Elez Geci, Ali Geci, Prelë Tuli, Adem Haxhosaj, and Demë Ali Pozhari. After writing them, User ComplexRational Speedy Deleted my page for Demë Ali Pozhari. The reason was that he claimed I entirely copied the main source I used, from Pashtriku.com. I was told I could rewrite the page as long as I write it in my own words. ComplexRational said "You are free to recreate the page provided you write everything in your own words." So, I decided to do that, and I began rewriting the entire page in my own words, leaving out much of the original page if I thought it may seem too similar to the article. As I sought to fix this, Sennecaster showed up and simply Speedy Deleted all the other pages I wrote, including Adem Haxhosaj, Elez Geci, Ramë Binaku, and Prelë Tuli, once again without any warnings or discussion, simply copy and pasting the same reply after already deleting. Finally, I rewrote the page for Demë Ali Pozhari and instantly Sennecaster deleted that as well, now claiming that although I changed the wording, the structure is still the same as now another article, which I barely even used in the writing of the article. I don't think Sennecaster read either the page nor the article and simply blocked me indefinitely. I appealed the block and was told to write this and tell what I would do differently. I think its clearly seen I would have taken the time to rewrite the pages and correct my problems, writing them in my own words, as I went and did with Demë Ali Pozhari. Although I think ComplexRational was wrong in the first place for deleting the page, I still went ahead and rewrote it, correcting the problems. I would have done that for the other pages as well but Sennecaster doesn't want to discuss anything and simply block me indefinitely. If Sennecaster actually cared enough to discuss this, the pages could have all been fixed appropriately and we wouldn't have to go through this nonsense.

Decline reason:

Warnings are not required, especially in cases like copyright violations which have legal implications. Warnings are also not required for each individual instance of a violation. We cannot allow copyright violations to remain even if you intend to fix them. They must be removed upon identification; your attitude towards this issue is very loose/cavalier. Sennecaster has made few edits since blocking you, you haven't given them a chance to engage you on this issue. They don't have to be on Wikipedia 24/7 to wait for your replies. I concur with their block, and as such I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Don't unblock me at all. I have barely worked on Wiki since I started and losing this is no loss of any significance whatsoever. The attitude from you guys is pathetic and as has always been expected from Wiki admins. "They don't have to be on Wikipedia 24/7 to wait for your replies" yet the whole thing happened within the hour and while I communicated with ComplexRational. I can tell Sennecaster has no time away from jacking his dick. When I recreated the article (all while he was online), he didn't read anything, neither my page nor the article he accused me of copyrighting, and simply deleted it and blocked me all within a few minutes. His claim for copyrighting Bota Sot was entirely bullshit as well since I barely even read the article to begin with and only used it for the main points, so I know he is a lowlife liar. He should have just stuck to the original argument and claim I copyrighted the structure of Pashtriku, which would have been more believable, even though I changed it up and wrote it in my own words. Anyways, going to Sennecaster's other comment in the block about me "not getting the point", I got the point way before his fat ass came along with the first reply. Hopefully he gets the point that I'm not trying to get unblocked, otherwise I would be on my knees acting like the bitch he is and wants me to be. He has no real-world authority and tries to use anything he can against random people on the internet. Have a good morning and Happy New Years. Shqypëtari (talk) 15:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Thanks for your contributions to Ali Geci. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to support the contents. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Go ahead and delete it. They're gonna say I copyrighted that too entirely like they did with the rest of my pages. I can't edit this page anyways, I'm blocked. Shqypëtari (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #112805 has been declined. JBW (talk) 09:51, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

UTRS appeal #113407 is in progress, but has resulted in a second Confirmed sock being caught and blocked: Shtëpâu. --Yamla (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Shqypëtari. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ali Geci".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 06:24, 2 July 2026 (UTC)