User talk:Starship V2

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Redacted II (talk) 13:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you for your message. Could you clarify which policy I violated? I would like to improve for the future. Starship V2 (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

You added unsourced info to List of Starship vehicles (No source was provided for S37 completing stacking, or S38's nosecone being integrated with its payload section).

Also, what does "T2 2025" mean for List of Starship launches? Redacted II (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

T2 means "Trimestre 2" (three monthes) for me but that's French. I didn't know what "Q" meant, but I know it now (it's "quarter"). I don't know how to place a link. Starship V2 (talk) 18:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

So, when using visual editor, there's an icon that looks like a quotation mark.

Click that.

It'll help with generating citations Redacted II (talk) 19:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

I'll try the next time, thank you. Starship V2 (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

No problem! Redacted II (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

But I don't know how to add a reference, for S37 stacking and S38 stacking onto its payload bay. Starship V2 (talk) 19:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

With <ref> Starship V2 (talk) 19:32, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

And there are ref name, I don't understand what is that Starship V2 (talk) 19:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

I'm terrible at source editing, so I can't really help you there.

But I can help with visual editing (and apologies for the terrible explanation).

So, when you click edit, there's a pencil icon in the top right section. Click that, and it will give you two options: source editing, and visual editing. Click visual editing.

Then, click right behind the text you want to add a reference for. In this case, do it behind the statement "S37 completed stacking on April 15". Then, click on the quotation mark labeled "cite". A popup will appear, with the options automatic, manual, and re-use. Click "automatic".

Then copy in the URL of the source, and click create.

You'll have a source. Redacted II (talk) 19:41, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Also, make sure the source is reliable. For example:

NASASpaceflight is a reliable source. WAI is... not. Redacted II (talk) 19:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

I'll use NSF, I think it's the best source Starship V2 (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

I added ref with informations on S37 (I found one for transfert tube but not for Stacked completed) and S38 Starship V2 (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Starship V2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Starship V2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I didn't want to publish it, I'm adding sources. Starship V2 (talk) 15:40, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

I wanted to publish it with sources. Starship V2 (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starship flight test 10 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/report any mistakes here) 15:26, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Why is it not accepted? Starship V2 (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Its simply too soon.

It's not notable yet. It will be (likely sooner rather than later), but it isn't now Redacted II (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Okay. I'll have to wait. Starship V2 (talk) 15:53, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Once starship flight test 10 page is added can you start working on starship flight test 11. I am a person that likes kind people (talk) 06:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

I could, yes. But Starship flight test 10 is currently WP:TOO SOON (not notable yet), we will have to wait until flight 9 has lifted off for it. Then, yes, I will. Starship V2 (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on B14-2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 16:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Sorry, I didn't mean to create a page on B14-2. I want to delete it. Starship V2 (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Starship flight test 11 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 13:09, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

Hmm... sources ARE reliable; NSF is a WP:RS Starship V2 (talk) 18:37, 6 August 2025 (UTC)

edited page if you don't mind before I logged in Starship future (talk) 22:56, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Noo it doesn't mind me Starship V2 (talk) 00:49, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

I’ve created a starship flight test 16 draft but not submitted it yet. Can you help me with it when flight 14 launches? Starship future (talk) 00:36, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes I can Starship V2 (talk) 09:49, 22 August 2025 (UTC)

thanks. Starship future (talk) 03:25, 23 August 2025 (UTC)