User talk:Assia.25

Hello, TOP1OILUSA, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the articles you created, such as Draft:TOP 1 Oil Products Company, may not meet Wikipedia's content policies. In short, to be included on Wikipedia, the topic of an article must be notable and have been covered by published reliable and independent sources.

Please read Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article for review. Note that articles are reviewed by volunteers and that it can take some time. If you'd like someone else to create an article, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or the page on contributing to Wikipedia. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – for contributing to other articles. Writing a new article is tough, so getting experience elsewhere is useful.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Johnj1995 (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:TOP 1 Oil Products Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit.

Deb (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Assia.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Assia_s10 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

The following request was written through the unblock wizard.

Can you explain, in your own words, why your edits were promotional?

My intention was not to promote the company, but to provide accurate, verifiable information about its presence and key achievements.

What is your relationship with the subjects you have been editing about?

I do not have any personal, professional, or financial relationship with the subjects I have been editing. I am editing to improve Wikipedia’s content as an independent contributor.

If you are unblocked, what topic areas will you edit in?

I will remove any content that promotes the business and focus only on verifiable, factual information that identifies the company.

Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?

I understand Wikipedia’s conflict-of-interest and neutral point-of-view policies and will ensure all future edits are factual, verifiable, and adhere to these guidelines.

TOP1OILUSA (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am unwilling to unblock you to, in the short term, edit about TOP 1 or other topics for which you have a conflict of interest. I would like to see a history of edits in areas unrelated to your conflicts of interest first, before you are permitted to make COI related edits. If that's okay with you, please tell what topics you might edit about in a new request; you may also make a new request to convince another admin to give you a better deal. 331dot (talk) 09:59, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

You disclosed on the draft that you were paid by your employer to edit, but now you say you have no "personal, professional, or financial relationship" with them. Which is it? 331dot (talk) 11:28, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

My earlier disclosure refers to being paid by my employer for general communications and research tasks. My employer is not TOP 1 Oil Products Company, and I have no personal, professional, or financial relationship with TOP 1 itself. I was asked by my employer to assist with drafting content related to a third party company owned by a family friend. I recognize that this still constitutes paid editing and a potential conflict of interest, which is why I disclosed it on the draft. Going forward, I understand the importance of full transparency and will strictly follow Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and neutral point of view guidelines. TOP1OILUSA (talk) 07:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

So you do have a professional relationship with TOP 1, your employer asked you to edit about them, it doesn't matter why they asked, or that your employer wants to use their resources to aid a friend. Once unblocked, you should disclose this relationship on your user talk page as well, for better visibility. You will need to name your employer as part of doing so.

Please read WP:BOSS, and show it to your employer (and, ideally, TOP 1). The vast majority of companies on Earth do not meet our requirements to merit a Wikipedia article.

Are there any edits you wish to make that are unrelated to a conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 08:59, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I do have a professional relationship in the sense that my employer asked me to help draft content about TOP 1 Oil Products Company, which is owned by a family friend. I understand that this constitutes paid editing and a conflict of interest, and I will fully disclose this relationship on my user talk page, including naming my employer, as suggested.

My intention was not to bypass Wikipedia’s standards but to create a factual entry for a company that has existed since 1979, similar to other lubricant companies with Wikipedia articles, such as Motul and Amalie Oil Company. My employer and his friend believed it was reasonable for the company to have a presence due to its long-standing history and verifiable accomplishments.

Once unblocked, I will revise the current draft to make it more neutral and properly sourced. TOP1OILUSA (talk) 09:38, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia articles do not merely provide facts, nor do they just document accomplishments; they summarize what independent reliable sources say about the topic. "Significant coverage" is critical analysis and commentary as to what independent sources view as important/significant/influential about the topic, not what it views as important about itself.

That competitors have articles does not necessarily mean that TOP 1 should too; we judge each article or draft on their own merits and not based on the presence of other articles that themselves may be inappropriate and just not yet addressed by a volunteer. There are many ways inappropriate content can exist on Wikipedia, this cannot justify adding more. Wikipedia does not provide equal time to all companies in a field, it depends on the sources. 331dot (talk) 09:58, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to explain this. I understand that Wikipedia relies on independent reliable sources and significant coverage, not just company-provided information. My goal is to ensure any content about TOP 1 is supported by independent sources and presented neutrally, and I will focus on meeting Wikipedia’s notability and verifiability standards if I am unblocked. TOP1OILUSA (talk) 10:33, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

Assia.25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Assia.25 (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

I have better understanding of Wikipedia's rules and restrictions and I want to comply.TOP1OILUSA (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=Assia.25 | 3=I have better understanding of Wikipedia's rules and restrictions and I want to comply.TOP1OILUSA (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Assia.25 | reason=I have better understanding of Wikipedia's rules and restrictions and I want to comply.TOP1OILUSA (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=Assia.25 | reason=I have better understanding of Wikipedia's rules and restrictions and I want to comply.TOP1OILUSA (talk) 08:02, 20 February 2026 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

• I have renamed your account. Another uninvolved admin will review your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 18:38, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
• Hi there! Can you explain in your own words what you would do differently if unblocked? Additionally, are you interested in editing any topics other than TOP 1? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:55, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

  If unblocked, I will not directly edit the TOP 1 Oil article and will instead suggest changes on the Talk page supported by reliable sources. I am also interested in contributing to other topics of interest in the automotive industry and the culinary field. Assia.25 (talk) 14:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

  (Non-administrator comment) Since there is currently no Wikipedia article on TOP 1 Oil, you are unable to suggest changes on the Talk page but rather create a draft from scratch—something extremely difficult and rarely successfully done. As others have said, the vast majority of companies do not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (found at WP:NCORP). I encourage you to read WP:BOSS and show it to your boss. Would you be willing to completely stay away editing about TOP 1 Oil on Wikipedia, if unblocked, or are you still interested in writing about it? GoldRomean (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2026 (UTC)