User talk:TechGeoPoliticist

Hi TechGeoPoliticist! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 05:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, TechGeoPoliticist. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trust now, forge later, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Dreamyshade. An edit that you recently made to Intentional electromagnetic interference seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. Dreamyshade (talk) 06:05, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Also, please don't add citations to a website in order to promote it. Dreamyshade (talk) 06:42, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

There seems to be only two links that don't work. Not because they were AI hallucinated, but because they might have changed. I just checked all the links. And "overly smooth content added in one fell swoop" means I prepared, not that it's AI generated. All the links were added because of their value for the topic, not a promotion. There are exactly zero commercial links. TechGeoPoliticist (talk) 07:20, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

Appreciate the response! You added citations to postquantum.com in three of four articles you edited, including updating a link to the site, and it's a self-published source that sounds very similar to the articles you created, so I'm sure you understand that this looks suspicious. I encourage running the text of intentional electromagnetic interference through an AI detection method trained on Wikipedia content, such as GPTZero Provenance Tool for Wikipedia or Pangram; they are not perfect, but they're often interesting.

The note about "failed verification" is about checking citations to see if they verify the statements. For example:

• I can't find support for "often discussed within the broader field of high‑power electromagnetics (HPEM)", "IEMI involves analog EM coupling into equipment and cables", or "state or state‑aligned groups" in this resolution.
• I can't find support for "IEMI is distinct from naturally occurring disturbances such as Geomagnetic storms and from non‑malicious electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) issues; it is also distinct from nuclear HEMP environments by its localized nature and diverse sources and waveforms" in this document.
• "IEMI remains a physical‑EM vector and, unlike software‑borne Cyber-kinetic attacks, does not require access to or exploitation of networked systems" is not supported by NIST's definition of cyber attack.

The citations could be improved though. If an article is well-cited and otherwise meets WP:Content policy, it's less important whether or not LLMs were involved, although it's good to note WP:NOLLM. Dreamyshade (talk) 08:21, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate the response. Postquantum.com articles were previously (long before LLMs see https://web.archive.org/web/20211207031719/https://cyberkinetic.com/cyber-kinetic-security/threat-of-iemi/) published on cyberkinetic.com and were the best popular write-up of these complex technical topics. I keep using them in my teaching. Since the author is these days selling quantum tech and related services, that have absolutely nothing to do with IEMI, I thought it would be obvious that it is not promotional. And stylistically it's very different from this page.

Appreciate the detailed review. To address your examples:

1) The linked resolution doesn't use HPEM and IEMI acronyms. But it does open with the mention of the previous resolution regarding "High Altitude Electromagnetic Pulse due to a Nuclear Explosion" i.e. HPEM. And then the rest of the resolution continues with "The present resolution is intended to draw the attention of the scientific community to the effects of criminal activities using electromagnetic tools. This kind of action can be defined as an intentional malicious generation of electromagnetic energy..." in which the "intentional malicious generation of electromagnetic energy" is exactly the IEMI. This particular resolution is the most credible source for the statement it was linked from. It just doesn't use the same acronyms.

2) The link in your second bullet point doesn't work for me at the moment. A better link would behttps://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/4124 And yes, this is the most credible industry report explaining the impact of HPEM, including IEMI, on civil systems. (I can update this link, unless you already changed it / removed it).

3) The NIST definition was used to confirm the definition of a "cyber attack" - as "Actions taken through the use of computer networks..." with IEMI then being different from cyber (as defined by NIST). But you are right that the link doesn't explain the distinction, it only confirms the definition of the "cyber" side. I'll look for a better version. TechGeoPoliticist (talk) 08:55, 14 July 2026 (UTC)