User talk:TheIshikawa

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Ledford, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page John Ledford, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Place Napton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I have made similar improvements to this article for review, including additions to Napton's involvement with Netflix's upcoming Gundam feature. TheIshikawa (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, TheIshikawa! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 02:12, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Kuru. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that in one of your recent contributions to AnimeTrax, you cited a link to a source that may not be reliable. Sources considered unreliable should generally not be used to support statements. Information from an unreliable source can be challenged by other editors and removed. Reliable sources are generally those with a reputation for fact-checking and editorial oversight. Self-published material, user-generated content, and certain other outlets such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites or publications with a poor reputation for fact-checking may not meet these standards. If you are unsure about which sources are appropriate, there is a list of sources that are considered generally reliable. Additionally, some WikiProjects have their own lists of sources that are considered reliable for that particular subtopic. If you are still unsure about a source's reliability, you can ask at the reliable sources noticeboard. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I see you reverted the entire edit so it's hard for me to see what sources you feel were unreliable. Can you assist me in understanding what you felt was not a reliable source so I can fix this and re-deploy? TheIshikawa (talk) 03:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately, when there's a large addition like that where I see many poor sources, the best solution is to just restore the stable version of the article. Just at a casual glance, I see content marketing blogs (Alibaba, modoshop), user-created blogs (alltheanime), user-generated material (fandom, avid.wiki, wikitide, discogs, rateyourmusic), and others. I think it would be a good idea to edit in smaller increments and carefully review the sources you are using. Read the material above. Sam Kuru (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I reviewed the links on reliable sources, and will address in any future update. I appreciate the response and information. TheIshikawa (talk) 20:17, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to not showing that O'Donnell meets our inclusion criteria, many of your citations do not appear to verify the claims that they are cited to support. For instance, does not support the claims made in the first paragraph of the "Early career" section.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John O'Donnell (anime industry executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 07:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

[1] is the announcement of the interview. As the interview itself is posted on Youtube and is referenced in the article, I didn't include the YouTube reference to the actual interview. Should I do so in order to add to this citation?

I can look to add additional citations, I'm sure I can find more to establish notability. TheIshikawa (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I have added several other articles from Publishers Weekly, Icv2, etc. to establish more WP:NIBO based on my understanding of the requirements. I have been referencing the press releases for the extensive interviews as I wasn't sure that one could reference video interviews directly. If you have any feedback you can provide on that, I would appreciate it for this and for future additions. Thank you. TheIshikawa (talk) 17:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)