User talk:Tiduji

Hello, Tiduji, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! EM (talk) 14:58, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Deity in Hinduism. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – [[:{{{article}}}]]. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at [[:{{{article}}}]]. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:{{{article}}}|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Fram (talk) 10:46, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Tiduji. Thank you for your work on Axe and deer. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Unfortunately, it is not yet ready for main space. Please add sources and establish notability as per WP:GNG. Currently all footnotes are blank. I will be moving it to draft. Please feel free to republish once it meets the above criteria. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:11, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You must stop edit warring and making unsourced edits in contentious topic areas. Please ensure you read and adhere to the requirements for editing articles in the South Asia topic area outlined in the blue box above or you will be blocked from editing. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:08, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ChildrenWillListen. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 12:52, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shiva. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please see also WP:3RR and WP:CITE. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:27, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Axe and deer 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 12:56, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Tiduji,

I noticed that you made some edits to the article for Shiva which got reverted, and I wanted to step in and offer some guidance and suggestions to help avoid conflict in the future. We'd love to have you as a contributor, but this is a team project and it's important to listen when other people object to your edits. Repeatedly re-adding content others have objected to (or edit warring, as it's called around here) is really not constructive and can lead to unpleasant conflicts. At worst, it can get you banned, so you need to be careful. If someone reverts one of your edits, then you should always discuss it with other editors before re-adding (or re-removing, for that matter) whatever it was that someone objected to. Post on the article talk page, or user talk pages, explaining the reasoning behind your edits, asking others why they objected to it in the first place, and see what the general consensus is. If people end up saying they're OK with your proposed change, then you can re-add it; if not, then just say "OK, I understand", and just let it go, it's not worth fighting over. Talking things out is super important for a community project like this one.

As for Shiva in particular, I think the main thing people are objecting to is that you've phrased things in a way that implies that Shiva is the Supreme Being in all of Hinduism, which is inaccurate -- he certainly is in Shaivism, but not in other strands like Vaishnavism, for example. Elaborating on the nature of his role as Supreme Being in Shaivism is fine, but it needs to be clear that this is specific to Shaivism and not universally believed by all Hindus.

Anyway, I'd love to see you use that enthusiasm to help us build great articles about Shaivism and other subjects you're interested in, so make sure to talk things over whenever there's a dispute, maybe read over some of our editing policies for advice on best editing practices, and don't hesitate to ask other people for help if you need it! I'd be glad to help show you the ropes while you find your footing as an editor, just give me a ping if you need anything.

Best wishes,

3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 07:20, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi Tidu Welcome to Wikipedia! Your efforts are appreciated but Your edited pieces or changed articles show a subtle bias towards some sects of Hinduism, often undermining the other sects.

I'd like to emphasize that Hinduism is a diverse religion with different paths and methods of reaching the Supreme Being, who manifests in different forms.

Subtle imposition of views of a sect instead of inculcating all views in a neutral perspective, keeping in mind religious sentiments.

For instance, the way you try to manipulate the article on Krishna showed a biased perspective towards Gujarati Traditions, often undermining Braj traditions like manipulating consorts section and falsely mentioning that only a select texts mention Radha,(while many of the mainstream texts underscore her role) is unhealthy for a vibrant and neutral platform wikipedia.

I hereby convey to you that Please reconsider your edits and do the needful in good faith. Also, refrain from editing sensitive topics when you do not have proper information. If further vandalism or false information is noticed, Your IP address access might be blocked.

Regards Mokshrajpal (talk) 09:20, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Also

understand that one sect is not superior over the other but supplementary to each other.

and you cannot imposed your sect's views over others. Mokshrajpal (talk) 09:28, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing certain areas of Wikipedia (Shiva) for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

— ERcheck (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

I have reverted your recent edits which you did on Radha's page. Stop pushing your POV. Care to check references provided on Radha's page. Even page numbers are mentioned. And yes, she is mentioned in both Shiv Puran and Skand Puran just for your information. If you have any concern, raise it on talk page of article and make consensus with fellow editors. Further vandalism may lead to edit warring and reporting it to higher level. Thank you. Kridha (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2026 (UTC)