User talk:Tsitp33

This is Tsitp33's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Tomforde (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liz Tomforde and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Tsitp33! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:06, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Hello, I'm TonySt. I noticed that you recently removed content from Paul Fireman without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. tony 17:16, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi TonySt, Thanks for reaching out and for restoring the content. I appreciate you taking the time to explain how edit summaries work, I'm still getting the hang of Wikipedia's processes. I should have included my reasoning in the edit summary itself. I did leave an explanation on the talk page about why I felt the information wasn't relevant to the article, but I realize now that's easy to miss if someone's just reviewing the edit history. Looking at it again, would it make more sense if I rephrased that section instead of removing it entirely? I'm happy to work on rewording it if that would address the relevance concerns while keeping the information in the article. Let me know what you think would work best! Tsitp33 (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles