User talk:Twilliams354

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Draft:Center for Inclusive Design and Innovation (CIDI)


Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LeapTorchGear was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
LeapTorchGear (talk) 20:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)
Hi @Twilliams354, I'm really sorry about this. The editor who declined your draft is not an AFC reviewer and declined your draft improperly. I've reverted the decline. -- asilvering (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for the update. Is there a way I can get this approved since it was declined improperly? Trying to get this done asap for my job. Thanks! Twilliams354 (talk) 16:13, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, I should have reviewed the draft myself when I reverted the decline - it was actually a very easy decline. Please have a read through the links in the decline message I just sent. Feel free to ask any questions you still have outstanding after that. -- asilvering (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Twilliams354! I noticed your contributions to Draft:Center for Inclusive Design and Innovation (CIDI) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing!


Teahouse logo
Hello! Twilliams354, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Inclusive Design and Innovation (CIDI) (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 22:19, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center for Inclusive Design and Innovation (June 18)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Helpful Raccoon, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
The draft has no independent sources about CIDI besides a directory entry; blatantly LLM-generated and needs to be rewritten from scratch.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 01:49, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI