User talk:Uskpp

Hello, Uskpp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Salt Typhoon did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  〜 Adflatuss • talk 20:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

There is no prove that Salt Typhoon is linked with China's MSS, only statements in newspapers (which also lack information). China deny that Salt Typhoon is linked with government, so the article looks like more a US propaganda. That's why I have changed "linked with China's Government" to "supposedly linked with China's Government". Uskpp (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

I have read almost all references and couldn't find any allegation that Salt Typhoon is a China's Ministery of Security State affiliation. So please if you think this is true, just link a reference to it that is not a dubious US newspaper. Uskpp (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 14:23, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

As I said, there is no prove that Salt Typhoon is linked with China's MSS, only statements in newspapers (which also lack information). I have read almost all references and couldn't find any original allegation that Salt Typhoon is a China's Ministery of Security State affiliation. So please if you think this is true, just link a reference to it that is not a dubious US newspaper. China deny that Salt Typhoon is linked with government, so the article looks like more a US propaganda. That's why I have changed "linked with China's Government" to "supposedly linked with China's Government". There is no reason to affirm that Salt Typhoon is linked with China's MSS because there is no prove beyon US allegations. Did you understood the problem? This, for the time being, is only a US narrative. You can't said this is "widely understood" or "weasel word" because this is what is not neutral and becomes disruptive. There's no neutrality. Uskpp (talk) 14:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)