User talk:ViperSnake151

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why revert my edit on WNOW-FM?

About Mascot 2018 Asian Games

Information icon Hello, I'm Andreas Evando P. I just knew that you reverted one of my recent contributions —the one I made with this edit to 2018 Asian Games— I'm telling you it's not fake. It's Official! Ika is now changed to Kaka. You can see it in their offical website. So please, you reverted my edit back. Thanks.

Countdown template and MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED.

It looks like you believe that the Countdown template should not be used in articles per MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED. At least it is whet you added in the Template:Countdown template.

I do not understand the rational of this addition, and I did not see your explanation. MOS:TIME and MOS:DATED are not involved in the same way:

  • MOS:TIME says "Context determines whether the 12- or 24-hour clock is used" this is for time and not for delays.
  • MOS:DATED does not ban the usage of Template:Countdown neither explicitly not implicitly.

Also, the template provide seconds accuracy: Brexit has started. (refresh)

Would it be possible to have a lower accuracy, for instance only the one or two more significant numbers such as 320 days and 1 hour or 45 weeks and 5 days?

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

Research Project

Hi Vipersnake151

I'm an anthropology student doing an online research project on wikipedians and their motivations and ideals for writing and editing wikipedia pages. I was wondering if you would be interested in answering a few questions I have - sort of like a small online interview.

Best Karoline Husbond (Student at University of Texas Austin) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Karohusb

Windows Update

Hello, why did you undo my edit on Windows Update, where I corrected "Windows ME" to the correctly spelled "Windows Me", which is the official way of how Microsoft writes this program in its short version?

Speedy deletion nomination of Weevac 6

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Weevac 6, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. chickenpox4dinner (talk) 23:54, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I regretted sending this through immediately - I don't think the article should be speedied. I am just having a lot of trouble finding additional secondary sources for the Weevac 6. Do you have any suggestions for solidifying notability of the topic? chickenpox4dinner (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI