User talk:Wanderllustforest
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Wanderllustforest's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyla Nicole Healey (February 3)
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyla Nicole Healey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, Wanderllustforest!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyla Nicole Healey (February 3)
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Better sources are needed than chart listings to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyla Nicole Healey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- If this submission was not generated by an LLM, as per your conversation with pythoncoder, I would strongly recommend fixing the broken formatting in the discography section and the html markers in the references before resubmitting. ScalarFactor (talk) 18:21, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- No it was not, and thank you for that I’m learning the correct formatting and trying to fix this. Thank you! I will cite more references and articles how many are needed? Wanderllustforest (talk) 22:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- A general rule of thumb is three reliable sources, that are independent from the author. If you're having trouble identifying them, you can try asking at the teahouse. In the current state of the article, reference 1 is an interview, reference 2 also appears to be an interview/otherwise associated, reference three is written by the subject, and the rest are chart listings, which aren't significant coverage. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- No it was not, and thank you for that I’m learning the correct formatting and trying to fix this. Thank you! I will cite more references and articles how many are needed? Wanderllustforest (talk) 22:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)