User talk:Wikiediter2029
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome to my talk page!
Important Notice: I may delete some old, non important junk on my talk page or old stuff on here. Don't expect it to stay.
NOTE: If I don't respond, leave me alone as I do not want to respond or due to the following reasons under I-I-I-I:
- I acknowledged it
- I want to ignore you
- I am busy
- I considered it offensive in my opinion or inappropriate
Also, it is my opinion if I want to respond, and if I remove the message but bring it back, STOP HARASSING ME!
Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
TonyBallioni (talk) 13:18, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Listing for discussion of Module:InfoboxNonEmergencyNumber
Module:InfoboxNonEmergencyNumber, a dependency of this page, has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 04:38, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
ChatGPT GA review
Hello and thanks for your contributions. I wanted to let you know that quick failing an article after yourself tagging it is not considered good form. The GA process encourages collaboration between nominator and reviewer to fix potential issues identified. Of course you are welcome to do so but I would encourage you not to. Looking forward to more of your edits! Czarking0 (talk) 01:33, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Capoeira
Hi - you reverted one of my edits on the capoeira page, which you didn't feel was constructive. I am removing original research from this page, replacing unreliable sources with reliable sources, and generally standardizing the page according to Wikipedia guidelines. Please discuss any disagreements you might have with my edits on the talk page for this article. Any info on the page not supported by reliable sources should be removed, because there are more than enough sources to properly support the entire article. Kind regards, Wrangler1981 (talk) 20:15, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hiya, sorry for any mishap. If possible, could you give me a permanent link to the edit that I reverted. If there was not much infomation on the edit summary, I would of likely not of known as I do high volume of Vandalism patrol and often don't really need to check sources and check for WP:V. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 16:50, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- This was the link. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capoeira&oldid=1366894592 I'm not vandalizing at all. I'm re-writing with reliable sources and deleting original research, in line with Wikipedia policy. Thank you for your attention. Wrangler1981 (talk) Wrangler1981 (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Cheers for the link. After looking, I really have messed up, likely to be one of my worst cock-ups ever I have done in Wikipedia. You're free to revert my revert, and I'll sort out removing the warning template. Thanks for making Wikipedia better. I must of been tired when doing this revert. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 20:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Ok, no problem. Have a great day. Wrangler1981 (talk) 20:38, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- Cheers for the link. After looking, I really have messed up, likely to be one of my worst cock-ups ever I have done in Wikipedia. You're free to revert my revert, and I'll sort out removing the warning template. Thanks for making Wikipedia better. I must of been tired when doing this revert. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 20:35, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
- This was the link. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Capoeira&oldid=1366894592 I'm not vandalizing at all. I'm re-writing with reliable sources and deleting original research, in line with Wikipedia policy. Thank you for your attention. Wrangler1981 (talk) Wrangler1981 (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Your signature
Hello, Wikiediter2029. I notice that your signature contains external links (see guidelines on external links). Use [[Special:Contributions/Wikiediter2029|Stalk My edits]] should replace your signature. Regards, In solidarity, KuyaMoHirowo (talk • contribs) 22:59, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Hiya! Thanks for letting me know and giving me the WikiText code. Have a great day! Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 18:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted

Hi Wikiediter2029, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 15:02, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EA Sports FC 27 Logo.webp

Thanks for uploading File:EA Sports FC 27 Logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
Use of sections tag
Please note that the sections tag is for articles which have content that needs to be divided into sections. It is therefore not suitable for stubs, as they have insufficient content to require division into sections. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 20:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I do often get confused by it. Wikiediter2029 (talk) Nosey? Stalk My edits 20:18, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, including the usage of this maintenance tag. The WP:BAREURLS article states that bare URLs are those simply of the link without the details of its title, author, work/publisher, etc. Ṉight Ḻantern 🏮 02:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)