User talk:Zas666

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Kaye (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Kaye (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
We need to demonstrate notability via reliable sources, under WP:42 and the two sources that look most plausible for this go to 404. If you are using LLM / AI / chatbots to source, kindly stop doing so, since under WP:NEWLLM it is not allowed. Ideally we would need 3 such independent sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
ChrysGalley (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zas666! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 10:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)
Yes, broken links sorry. But I tried to add a link to the Kickstarter project, and it is blacklisted (https://www.<removethat>kickstarter.com/projects/partyrobotics/bartendro-a-cocktail-dispensing-robot/), the matching GitHub project still exists as https://github.com/partyrobotics/bartendro
About the Guardian article it doesn't exist anymore online :(
And yes, I used LLMs to create an initial page in the hope contributors will improve it.
Apparently it doesn't work like this anymore on Wikipedia.
So, I guess no point in submitting more changes, as your requirements are far too high for me. Zas666 (talk) 12:27, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI