User talk:~2026-21314-14

Summarize Timeline Fact Check

I'm writing this as a final attempt to resolve those recent events rather than administrative intervention.

Since the nomination and the closure of 'Criticism of C++' AfD, I noticed a persistent and disruptive pattern that you (and before, your old admitted anonymous IP account here) follow my contributions across different articles – including but not limited to Manual memory management, list of programming languages, coroutines; only to either revert my edits or modify those pages immediately after I have edited them.

This disruptive behaviour falls under WP:WIKIHOUNDING. And also, your admitted use of multiple accounts to engage in the same discussions is a violation of WP:SOCK. While I am trying to improve wikipedia with my edits, you are disrupting me with your harassment. If you continue this pattern, I am going to compile those issues to the administors' noticeboard/incidents without any hesitation. Let’s focus on constructive editing instead. Birthay boy (talk) 20:14, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

I gave you the opportunity to respond at Talk:List of programming languages by type#Smart pointers/RAII, which you haven't responded to.

And also, your admitted use of multiple accounts to engage in the same discussions is a violation of WP:SOCK.

Do you understand what temporary (anonymous) accounts are or not? Please read WP:LOGOUT.

I also think you don't understand what understand what constitutes WP:HOUNDING either. Please read the following passage:

Many users track other users' edits, although usually for collegial or administrative purposes. This should always be done with care, and with good cause, to avoid raising the suspicion that an editor's contributions are being followed to cause them distress, or out of revenge for a perceived slight. Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles.

Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions.

You have introduced several formatting, grammatical, and even informational errors in the process of your edits, and any edit, no matter the author, may be subject to the scrutiny of anyone else, so long as the scrutiny falls under reasonable usage. The edits I have engaged in after yours do not constitute WP:TENDENTIOUS editing, are not disruptive, and do not include personal attacks. The pages you have listed either contained poor English usage or factually untrue statements, or (in the case of Manual memory management) were pages I have edited before you have. And as long as these edits remain this way, then my edits to fix the mistakes you persistently introduce into articles will continue.

~2026-21314-14 (talk) 20:24, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Somewhen (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2026 (UTC)