Wartime repression of Surrealism in Japan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wartime repression of Surrealism in Japan describes the surveillance, censorship, arrests, interrogations, renaming of groups, and other pressures that affected Surrealist writers, artists, critics, and photographers in Japan in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Surrealism in Japan took shape through overlapping literary, artistic, and photographic circles rather than a single national group, and later scholarship has discussed its wartime curtailment in relation to the Peace Preservation Law, police suspicion of links with communism, and the tightening cultural controls of the period.[1][2] The best-known episode was the 1941 detention of Fukuzawa Ichirō and Shūzō Takiguchi, but later accounts have also noted the scrutiny of magazines and exhibitions, the use of self-censorship, and the renaming, narrowing, or suspension of avant-garde activity more broadly.[3][4]
Surrealism became known in Japan in the late 1920s through poetry, translation, criticism, and little magazines, before extending into painting and photography.[5][6] It did not take shape as a single, unified movement. Instead, as The International Encyclopedia of Surrealism notes, its history in Japan was marked by individual engagements and overlapping circles rather than a cohesive national group.[7]
That development also took place in an increasingly restrictive political climate. The Peace Preservation Law of 1925 and the activities of the Special Higher Police, or Tokkō, formed part of the background against which Surrealist activity unfolded. The International Encyclopedia of Surrealism describes Japanese Surrealism as having developed in a "hostile environment", while Stojković argues that the absence of a single Surrealist center in Japan cannot be separated from a period in which organized opposition had been made illegal and public identification with suspect movements could invite surveillance or prosecution.[8][9]
By the 1930s, Surrealism had become more visible through exhibitions, publications, and regional activity beyond Tokyo. Later accounts stress that its development was not confined to the capital, but extended to Kyoto, Nagoya, Fukuoka, and other centers.[10] Wartime pressure therefore fell not on one institution, but on a dispersed network of writers, artists, and photographers working across several media and locations.[11]
Wartime pressure and the 1941 arrests
By the later 1930s, the wider circulation of Surrealist ideas coincided with tightening wartime controls. Stojković argues that, under these conditions, even public support for or identification with Surrealism could become risky.[12]
The crisis became sharper in 1941. The 2024 catalogue Surrealism and Japan states that Japanese militarism did not allow freedom of expression and that, on the grounds of Surrealism's alleged relationship to communism, Fukuzawa Ichirō and Takiguchi Shūzō were arrested and detained in 1941, while painters were compelled to exercise self-restraint in their expression.[13] The 1990 exhibition catalogue Japan's Surrealism: 1925-1945 likewise treated these events as a distinct "Surrealism repression incident" within the history of the movement.[14]
In an essay on the wartime transformation of the Bijutsu Bunka Association, Ozaki Masato argues that the arrests of Takiguchi and Fukuzawa, which took place just before the association's second exhibition, also served as an effective warning to the wider avant-garde. He describes the association's subsequent declarations of loyalty and accommodation to wartime themes as part of a process of self-limitation and "self-extinction".[15]
Renaming, self-restraint, and photography circles
Pressure on Surrealist activity did not take the form of arrests alone. One recurring response was the adoption of safer terminology and the renaming of groups.
Nagoya provides a particularly clear regional example of how such pressure reshaped photographic practice. Stojković argues that Surrealist photography in Japan developed under conditions created by the Peace Preservation Law, in which open identification with Surrealism could invite surveillance or prosecution, and that photographers increasingly negotiated a precarious public position through euphemistic terms such as "avant-garde" and later "plastic" photography.[16][17] A chronology in Japan's Modern Divide records that Kansuke Yamamoto was interrogated by the Thought Police in 1939 over Yoru no Funsui and was not permitted to continue publishing the journal in the same form. It also records that the Nagoya Photo Avant-Garde changed its name in November 1939 to the Nagoya Photography Culture Association in order to avoid attracting police attention, moved in a more conservative direction, and dissolved in 1941.[18]
At the same time, these pressures did not bring Surrealist practice in Nagoya to an immediate end. Stojković notes that some of Yamamoto's photographs produced after his separation from the Nagoya club rank among the strongest examples of Surrealist photography made in Japan during the decade, including works published in Kōkaku in 1940.[19]