Wicked Lady (novel)

The novel appears to have taken at least a year to write. A News & Observer article from March, 1961, reported that Fletcher had already selected the title and was developing the story.^[8]

Wicked Lady was generally not considered by critics to be up to the standard of Fletcher's earlier work.

In her review for the Nashville Banner, Leila Douglas Phillips wrote that "Wicked Lady is neither historically as great an effort nor character-wise up to the standards of some of [Fletcher's] exceedingly popular historical romances, Raleighʻs Eden, Toil of the Brave and Queen's Gift."^[9] Similarly, the Boston Globe wrote that "Mrs. Inglis is a long way, in this stilted hodgepodge, from the skills she displayed in Raleighʻs Eden."^[10] The Hamilton Spectator called it "wearying" and "a bore," stating: "Mrs. Fletcher is reciting American history here in the way Upton Sinclair did in the Lanny Budd series and she does it poorly."^[11]

A positive review in the Newport News Daily Press called it "the work of the historical novelist at its best" and opined that Fletcher's fanbase would pleased with it.^[12] The Fort Worth Star-Telegram offered little praise beyond a general observation that it "effectively combines fact and fiction."^[13] The St. Louis Post-Dispatch called it "light reading about a very dark lady."^[14] It was described as "not a great book, by any stretch of the imagination," by The Province, but "a good mix of war and love that would fit into a summer's day reading."^[15]