Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhijeet Dipke

Abhijeet Dipke

Abhijeet Dipke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much of what the coverage is comes through Cockroach Janta Party, from the past few days. I don't think it clears up WP:1E limitations yet. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 07:05, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politics, and India. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 07:05, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Maharashtra. jolielover♥talk 07:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep – I believe the article should be kept because the subject appears to have received significant coverage in independent reliable sources, not just passing mentions or affiliated/social-media coverage. The article can be improved with better sourcing rather than deleted.

Pulsar2018 (talk) 09:28, 21 May 2026 (UTC) — Pulsar2018 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Keep ~2026-30473-63 (talk) 17:24, 21 May 2026 (UTC) — ~2026-30473-63 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• I think this should be deleted, because it is nonsensical and weird and doesn't make any sense to have. The person is a mere speculator in the world of politics and has no real power whatsoever, and his party is a parody at best. TheDukeOfAbersford (talk) 19:14, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – Most coverage is recent, tied primarily to Cockroach Janta Party rather than the individual himself, and does not satisfy Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for biographies WP:GNG or WP:BIO. Coverage appears concentrated in a short viral news cycle. A mention within the Cockroach Janta Party article would likely be more appropriate at this stage. Crushedoreos (talk) 11:37, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Keep - I think the person has become a big point of attention in society, be it mainstream news media or social media. I myself do not subscribe to the ideologies of Abhijeet, however I do not think his article should get deleted. Obviously let scenario unfold and we can expand the article in future. Shakya2007 (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NBIO, WP:NPOL. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NPOL. Only notable for founding Cockroach Janata Party which has its own page. Zalaraz (talk) 13:50, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

  I agree. ~2026-30661-49 (talk) 07:14, 22 May 2026 (UTC) — ~2026-30661-49 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  I dont think we should delete it! He has news pages because of his Cockroach Party! And the LLM part can be edited so its human ~2026-28508-79 (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep. It's has got a lot of coverage in very short time. A$ianeditorz (talk) 15:30, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
• Speedy keep EduExplorer47 (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

  Per which criteria are you asking for a speedy keep? — Raihanur (talk) 13:17, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete Possible COI, definite WP:NPOL Adsaeds (talk) 16:50, 21 May 2026 (UTC) — Adsaeds (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment : Possible conflict starter like WP vs ANI battle Adsaeds (talk) 16:52, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep definitely meets WP:AUTHOR Sarim Wani (talk) 16:55, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party Charlie (talk) 01:42, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete: Most reliable coverage has been recent and tied with the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP). The article fails WP:NPOL and should be deleted. Though, I also wouldn't mind having it be made a redirect to the article on the CJP. — EarthDude (Talk) 03:45, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

• Delete The argument regarding WP:NPOL remains unanswered. Koshuri ^(あ!) 05:07, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party:: It has coverage right now, but mainly due to the viral meme (One Event). It's WP:TOOSOON to create. Time will tell if this is going to be relevant or not. Right now it's too early. Lordofhunter (talk) 06:01, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party: The subject does meet basic requirements with independent sources for a mention on Wikipedia, but he is only known for one currently happening event, so I think we should put his role in a section of the Cockroach Janta Party article, then later if he gets more traction or is known for multiple notable events, we can eventually make his a separate article. Nanomi Sakura 08 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 13:53, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep notable BBC – Veritasphere (talk) 12:35, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

  Nothing more than a passing mention here. Zalaraz (talk) 15:52, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

  https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/who-is-abhijeet-dipke-the-boston-educated-founder-of-cockroach-janata-party-101779346291274.html Veritasphere (talk) 05:50, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep Clearly attracting more and more traction as time passes by. Kaeez06 (talk) 12:47, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

• Keep: He meets GNG and WP:BASIC. See: this, this, this, this, this, this... I don't think he is a full politician (yet) to apply WP:NPOL.. — Raihanur (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

  Much of this is still via Cockroach Party. As @Nanomi Sakura 08 says above according to what I said in the nomination, the subject still doesn't move beyond WP:1E limitations, even though the coverage through the party coverage is huge, but still its connected, not directly about him, and extensive. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 17:28, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party: His notability is basically CPJ. — Longewal (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party as per Longewal and Nanomi Sakura 08. R. M. Holda - (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party per WP:BLP1E. SerChevalerie (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party: Fails WP:NBIO and WP:1E criteria. CJP is the only notability found. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 05:50, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: Meets GNG

Pagers (talk) 07:48, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party per WP:NOPAGE. Wareon (talk) 08:28, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party. This is a classic case where WP:PAGEDECIDE is to be applied. Having sources doesn't necessarily mean there has to be a standalone page; this can be comfortably accommodated under the larger article. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Not significant enough for seperate Wikipedia article. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 11:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

*Merge with Cockroach Janta Party: Fails WP:NBIO and WP:1E criteria. The subject appears to be notable only in connection with the Cockroach Janta Party, with no significant independent coverage outside of CJP-related context. Draconhs (talk) 11:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE ~SG5536B 10:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

• Merge with Cockroach Janta Party. Wanderer (talk) 16:24, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
• Merge with the CJP article per above. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:03, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
• Delete as the article's notability is dependent on the foundation of Cockroach Janata Party, failing notability for biographies. Babin Mew (talk) 04:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Merge with Cockroach Janta Party. Kalpesh Manna 2002 (talk) 11:02, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

@Kalpesh Manna 2002 You can't vote twice. Earlier you had voted for a delete and now for a merge. Please strike out any one of your opinions. BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.