Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansariyan Publications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ansariyan Publications
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ansariyan Publications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I was unable to find any sources that help notability, though I did not search in Persian. A lot of citations to books they have published and nothing else. As far as I am aware, fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- Comment. As PARAKANYAA rightly points out, the English sources here fail and just point back to the publisher's own catalog. Deleting a longstanding Iranian publisher without checking Persian sources is maybe a gap. Charlie Zachary Allen Roth (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- I mean I tried, but searching in the Persian writing system is difficult for me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Iran. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:23, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related AfD discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
- I agree with @Charlie Zachary Allen Roth's comment. It probably shouldn't be deleted without someone checking. You could ask some of these people: Category:Iranian Wikipedians.
- Thanks, -- LightningThrower (talk) 16:44, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems to be a general sense that there may be sources in Farsi. Relisting in case any can be found.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:41, 3 August 2026 (UTC) - Keep. Nominating without proper research in farsi or other languages seems to be a clear violation of WP:DILIGENCE #1 Victor Zaak Saraiva (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Victor Zaak Saraiva What notability guideline does this pass? PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- I guess it remains to be seen whether this does not pass any notability guideline in the first place. We need better info before discussing this properly either way Victor Zaak Saraiva (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- There are 0 reliable, significant, independent sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- We could be confident to claim that after proper research ~2026-42047-63 (talk) 10:10, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- There are 0 reliable, significant, independent sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:12, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- I guess it remains to be seen whether this does not pass any notability guideline in the first place. We need better info before discussing this properly either way Victor Zaak Saraiva (talk) 07:55, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Victor Zaak Saraiva What notability guideline does this pass? PARAKANYAA (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
- Delete No sig cov disclosed. Mme Maigret (talk) 08:42, 4 August 2026 (UTC)