Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifton Mooney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus on account of lack of participation. No prejudice against speedy renomination. Salvio giuliano 15:28, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Clifton Mooney

Clifton Mooney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. No suitable sources in the article, and none found during BEFORE. Meadowlark (talk) 09:19, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio giuliano 10:17, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notable by WP:ARTIST#3, sources already in the article establish that his work has been reviewed by many publications including, as already noted, the New York Times.Katzrockso (talk) 11:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
    My concern with the NYT piece is that it's an interview with - in my opinion at least - nothing really transformative to take it from 'interview with artist' to 'interview with the artist that is primarily a review of their art'. It is the strongest source; the next few cited are an interview (Out), a sales page (Boys), the artist's description of a particular work (PNPPL), and links to articles the artist's photographs have illustrated with no further information (Interview Magazine). The remainder are similar to those I've just listed. Meadowlark (talk) 16:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 13:03, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks