Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Strong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

David Strong

David Strong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria for WP:NACADEMIC, a cursory search for additional references did not yield anything meaningful. Snuggle📫 11:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Philosophy. Snuggle📫 11:22, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment I found three reviews of his book Crazy Mountains and added them to the article. On his other book, he's one of three editors. I didn't look for reviews of that one yet. It's borderline for WP:AUTHOR. His first book is arguably notable, in which case we'd redirect his name to the book if we had an article. Jahaza (talk) 17:35, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment: this has been tagged as a potential NACADEMIC failure since 2021. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch 20:10, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Montana, and New York. WCQuidditch 20:11, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:29, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Refactor to argue about Crazy Mountains, the notable topic here. It's not like we'd be losing much. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:19, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per WP:AUTHOR. Along with another review of Crazy Mountains, I found and added to the article seven reviews of the coedited volume. I agree that with only one of these books being authored, it's borderline, but I think on the positive side of the border. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:22, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per David Eppstein. I think reformatting this to be about Crazy Mountains rather than Strong would be a silly result; he's more notable than the book. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:27, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: With Weak Keeps and Comments, this is still a no consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI