Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ECLR-attributed grammar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to LR-attributed grammar. (non-admin closure) BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 17:32, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

ECLR-attributed grammar

ECLR-attributed grammar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging to LR-attributed grammar because I could only find limited coverage in Google Books and Scholar. I am not entirely sure whether it meets WP:GNG, I didn't look thoroughly enough, but I am sure that it falls under WP:NOPAGE, all 3 criteria. Also, WP:SHORTTEXT HerrHeulsuse (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Mathematics, and Computing. HerrHeulsuse (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Merge per nom and WP:MERGECON and WP:MERGESHORT. ~ A412 talk! 15:33, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Merge to LR-attributed grammar per nom. archive.org has similarly limited coverage. WP:DUE might even limit how much we cover ECLR-attributed grammars in the merge target, e.g. Sikkel (1997) merely states The literature contains a host of different parsing algorithms for LR-attributed grammars. ... Each one defines a particular class of grammars on which it is guaranteed to work correctly. All these classes are subtly different ... A taxonomy is presented by op den Akker, Melichar and Tarhio [1980 [sic]]., and the latter paper only covers ECLR-attributed grammars as one of many different variants. Preimage (talk) 17:45, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
  • Merge per nominator's rationale. FaviFake (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks