Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Weld (Senior)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ——Serial 08:27, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Edward Weld (Senior)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edward Weld (Senior) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
local notable, involved in a few trivial incidents. No lasting influence on the historical record DGG ( talk ) 20:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep I think there's plenty of coverage among the sources cited in the article, along with ones from reputable journals such as this article in Urology; sure, maybe not the most important historical character, but definitely an interesting one with decent coverage. I don't see any harm in keeping the article. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 02:33, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Article has been expanded significantly since this AfD was filed, with numerous sources to book and historical journals. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:35, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep As said above the article has been expanded since the AFD started. There are also enough sources provided for an article. CreativeNorth (talk) 13:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Article content and supporting material speaks for itself. --Po Mieczu (talk) 21:49, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - an important article that speaks to so many important things that are historic and well documented. Atsme Talk 📧 23:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- 'withdraw the AfD nomination' I still think is sub- encyclopedic , but I know when I'm out!voted. DGG ( talk ) 23:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.