Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Executive Order 14366
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — CactusWriter (talk) 21:35, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
Executive Order 14366
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Executive Order 14366 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability or lasting significance; no sources on what came of the order. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:14, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Law and United States of America. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:00, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:35, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- 19, April 2026:
- -I added additional independent sources (Bloomberg, NYT and WSJ); expanded coverage too.
- Note: The notability of the subject goes beyond the signing date on December 11, 2025. 𝓛𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓣𝓗𝓔 (talk) 23:51, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- These sources cover the exact same information. Wikipedia is not news. WP:SBST:
Even a large number of news reports that provide no critical analysis of the event is not considered significant coverage
elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:37, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- These sources cover the exact same information. Wikipedia is not news. WP:SBST:
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 17:01, 25 April 2026 (UTC) - Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep: per Bearian Bravelake (talk) 03:32, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep sources look quite decent actually. Agnieszka653 (talk) 04:28, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.