Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flee the Facility (video game)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flee the Facility (video game)

Flee the Facility (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Moved unilaterally to mainsoace. Per AFC comment by SmokeyJoe "This is just a little game in Roblox. There are no sources that give it any more than a very brief description, or documents its history without comment. Not in th reference list, or elsewhere I can find. It has no chance of survival at AfD. " Fails WP:NVIDEOGAME, merge anything salvageable to Roblox. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 07:36, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete - per nom. Was on my way to nominate this myself. Sulfurboy (talk) 07:51, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete – Agreed with SmokeyJoe; Timtrent and Sulfurboy, although some of the non–primary sources, may be reliable, according to the total amount of citations, 1/3 of those citations, are primary, and the fact in which, the amount of citations, which are primary, is 1/3 of them, provides evidence of how Flee the Facility, is not eligible, of consisting of a standalone article, of own. Not only this, however, majority of the other citations, are also list citations, which also proves, for why Flee the Facility, is not eligible, of consisting of a standalone article, of own, because, in list citations, the source in which, the citation is located from, is divided into sections/paragraphs, which discuss about different topics, explaining about what that topic does, and/or what that topic is about, which relates towards the primary/main topic, of the source, and here in Wikipedia, the primary reason, for why we don't use, list citations within standalone articles, (excluding if the "standalone" article, even is a list itself), is due to in which, list citations, do not provide, the WP:SIGCOV, which is required, for the subject of the standalone article, to even consist of said article, as the source, is literally divided, into different sections/paragraphs, which discuss about different topics, which relate towards the primary/main topic, of the source, and doesn't only discuss about the one main topic, (which within this scenario, is Flee the Facility), throughout atleast majority, of that entire source. In my defense, I assume in which, Flee the Facility, should rather remain, within List of Roblox games, rather than also consisting, of a standalone article, of own. MrDevolver (talk) 10:08, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Merge to List_of_Roblox_games#Flee_the_Facility. Fails WP:GNG. The sources in the article are mostly primary, and the ones which are not are not substantial in coverage of the game. However, some relevant information, specifically the reception section, can be merged to this page, and then a redirect should be put in place. jolielover♥talk 10:47, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. There is nothing to merge. List the references here to be sure, but there is no content worthy of keeping. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:21, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
The Reception section contains prosified facts of the game being listed in a list, no comment on why it is listed. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:28, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
The nomination at the Innovation Awards & the 'Rock Paper Shotgun' list is relevant enough to be merged IMO. jolielover♥talk 14:41, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
both report, without comment, that it was listed.
The prose in this article is below being worth attribution. Reusing references doesn’t require attribution, doesn’t require a “merge” decision. SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:54, 26 July 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI