Wikiwand AI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustave Fallot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 09:19, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Gustave Fallot

Gustave Fallot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination Does not meet WP:GNG requirements. Lots of minor mentions in Google Books but no significant coverage. The best treatment appears to be a blog post. Article has been incubating in mainspace since 2012 and hasn't improved beyond a stub. Subject also has an entry in French Wikipedia. (Incidentally, the references on that page also don't disclose sig cov in 2 or more independent reliable sources.) Mme Maigret (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

  • Keep From a 2 minute cursory glance, I've easily been able to find sources about Fallot. The first is absolulely unimpeachable, and the others easily support this biography passing WP:N and WP:V.
  • Wey, Francis (1839). "Étude Sur la Langue Française, A Propos de l'Ouvrage Posthume de Gustave Fallot". Bibliothèque de l'École des Chartes. 1: 460–490. doi:10.3406/bec.1840.461647. JSTOR 42997546.
  • Wey, Francis (1840). "Étude sur la langue française: à propos de l'ouvrage posthume de Gustave Fallot".
  • https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/economics/proudhon/1837/application-for-the-suard-application.html
  • https://files.libcom.org/files/Proudhon%20-%20A%20Biography.pdf
  • https://www.bibliotheque-institutdefrance.fr/content/gustave-fallot
Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:55, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:HEY. Good rescue. I updated the tags. Bearian (talk) 15:51, 25 April 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep — great rescue per WP:HEY. The JSTOR-archived study offers definitive scholarly coverage that easily satisfies WP:GNG. EmilyR34 (talk) 04:42, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks