Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques Zuida
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:52, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Jacques Zuida
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jacques Zuida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As I mentioned in the first edition, I created this page using my work for the DIMA, which has the advantage of being CC0, meaning it's free to use as long as it is cited. A very attentive individual, particularly regarding the anarchist project, and even more the topics I work on, and anarcho-syndicalist historiographical myths in general, pointed out that relying on a single source is not ideal. Since I had seen multiple books created within the project without even a single centered source, I thought one good-quality centered source was sufficient. It allowed me to document people who likely knew and evolved alongside my ancestors and to share part of my work for free on WP. Since this is clearly not the standard, I am requesting deletion. I will do the same for all my anarchist entries that rely on only one or two identical sources (DIMA/Maitron). Aristoxène (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Aristoxène (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of France-related AfD discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:27, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep - third party sources which are at least decent enough for inclusion. WP:GNG applies as well.BabbaQ (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep. Once you post something of your creativity on Wikipedia, you license it for others to use responsibly. I don't see a legitimate reason to delete, and the Burden of proof for an article about a dead person is on the nomination. Be careful what you post. Now you know. Bearian (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.