Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Aastha National Weekly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 02:08, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Jana Aastha National Weekly
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jana Aastha National Weekly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Totally unsourced for years, not finding any secondary coverage. Mariamnei ✦ reach out 🕊️ 09:40, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Nepal. Shellwood (talk) 09:55, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
- draftify - From what i found on 1, 2, 3, 4 weekly seems to be notable(for controversial topics). i think it's better to draftify . Khagendra (talk) 16:45, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: it is unclear why we would draftify here if the article was indeed notable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:23, 23 June 2026 (UTC)- the article currently does not cite any sources, But after my quick search i found few sources indicating subject might pass WP:GNG. Hence i couldn't !vote delete keeping in current condition is not ideal either, i also noticed author is active if he wish to improve(which seems doable) drafting seems proper solution. I would not strongly oppose either a Keep or Delete result, particularly in light of the limited participation in the discussion and the absence of comments from the creator. Khagendra (talk) 10:58, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 23:25, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.