Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krabeni

Krabeni

Krabeni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am convinced that this might fail WP:GNG (and also WP:NSPORT as well per Fazlija's profession). I was able to find this, but with the lack of many reliable sources (current ones seem unreliable) and having no listed won awards in the article, well that's my opinion after a WP:BEFORE search. — SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)

• Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Kosovo. SimpleObjects-9ei 🍂/🌰/🤗 (see talk) 21:27, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, no reliable and significant notability and nothing to establish a WP:POTENTIAL, apart some very minimal routine coverage. Chiserc (talk) 22:42, 24 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: Declined draft moved to articlespace by creator without subsequent substantial improvement. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 04:13, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete: As per above and nomination PlainJane91 (talk) 06:20, 25 September 2026 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Ryan shell (talk) 13:33, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete. Doesn't make NATHLETE. Khalitate (talk) 06:46, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

• Delete – two of the four refs are results-database profiles, and the other two are brief esports newsbriefs, one of them about another player. That is not the significant coverage WP:GNG asks for. Kukuryza (talk) 18:47, 30 September 2026 (UTC)

  • Delete, minimal coverage, no reliable sources WP:RS, fails to demonstrate WP:GNG

  Lincolnkiptoo26 (talk) 07:08, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.