Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kulovića Street
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Arguments are all over the place here, with none especially strong. A split/merge discussion can take place on the article talk page and may result in more productive and focused discussion without deletion on the table; I encourage User:Darkfrog24 to look into this route. (non-admin closure) Toadspike [Talk] 03:00, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Kulovića Street
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kulovića Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Looks to fail WP:GNG. Not seeing evidence of the street being notable, only things related to it (the siege or buildings on it). Doesn't pass WP:GEOROAD either. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 16:51, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- I mean, GNG isn't at zero: but it's also not the strongest. SportingFlyer T·C 20:38, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For engaging more participation to reach a consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HilssaMansen19 (talk) 18:47, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Keep, it passes WP:GNG.
Not seeing evidence of the street being notable, only things related to it (the siege or buildings on it).
Well, yes. I imagine it is only with ancient roads where the road itself might be notable. Otherwise a street will be a topic of coverage because of notable buildings on it or because of notable events, both of which the nominator has recognised. TurboSuperA+(connect) 19:58, 21 May 2025 (UTC)- Do note that notability is not inherited. Notability only cares about significant coverage about the street itself. Buildings adjacent to a street do not automatically make the street notable, unless there is significant coverage about the street in those sources. I, personally, am not finding significant coverage about the street to meet WP:GNG. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 20:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- It is also mentioned here and here . TurboSuperA+(connect) 04:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Do note that notability is not inherited. Notability only cares about significant coverage about the street itself. Buildings adjacent to a street do not automatically make the street notable, unless there is significant coverage about the street in those sources. I, personally, am not finding significant coverage about the street to meet WP:GNG. JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs) 20:13, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 11:32, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
- Split up and Merge with Sarajevo and the articles about the street's notable landmarks. Darkfrog24 (talk) 03:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.