Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marguerite Wapler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:54, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
Marguerite Wapler
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Marguerite Wapler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page was created using the DIMA entry. A very attentive individual, particularly regarding the anarchist project, and even more the topics I work on, and anarcho-syndicalist historiographical myths in general, pointed out that relying on a single source is not ideal. Since this the two quoted sources are basically identical, I am requesting deletion. I will do the same for all my anarchist entries that rely on only one or two identical sources (DIMA/Maitron) Aristoxène (talk) 09:52, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of People-related AfD discussions. Aristoxène (talk) 09:52, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Women and France. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:54, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep - multiple book sources and other third party source. WP:GNG applies as well.--BabbaQ (talk) 08:49, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. Misguided nomination by author. DIMA refers to the Dictionnaire international des militants anarchistes, a biographical dictionary. Generally, tertiary sources like this are, themselves, based on secondary sources. An entry in a biographical dictionary is strong evidence of notability and the biography can, presumably, be improved with a bit of research. pburka (talk) 22:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.