Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Fleming (politician)

Pat Fleming (politician)

Pat Fleming (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Satisfies neither the criteria at Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Politicians nor the more general criteria at Wikipedia:Notability; sources cited are intrinsic to the subject politician, or are general government information sources, and do not constitute multiple instances of non-trivial, independant, reliable-source coverage. If article is deleted, the DAB page at Pat Fleming should be undone. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 19:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

nomination rescinded, as moot: Her successful election makes this AfD nomination no longer applicable, as WP:POLITICIAN has now been clearly satisfied. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 01:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 22:15, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• Delete I hope she wins, at which point she will be notable per se, but as of yet is not. Bearian (talk) 18:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• KeepSeems she won - see Arizona House of Representatives. MikeHobday (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Arizona House of reps website lists her as a member, therefore meets WP:POLITICIAN. Valenciano (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.