Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popular Science Predictions Exchange

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Popular Science. (non-admin closure) Svartner (talk) 04:10, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Popular Science Predictions Exchange (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should be redirecting to Popular Science. One of those small early prediction market experiments from the 2000s. From what I see, this doesn't have the citations that notability criteria require. Azyrii (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 01:41, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
  • Redirect per nom - I looked for sources, found one news article and a few passing mentions in scholarly pubs. Not enough for a stand-alone article, imo Eddie891 Talk Work 21:12, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI