Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RIM Charts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JGHowes talk 02:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
RIM Charts
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Non-Notable subject, advertising, a total of 40 reference is of same kind, (i.e repeted 40 times) . Sturdyankit (chat) 03:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - I disagree with your proposal to delete this article. Furthermore, sources are provided. Please consider this.–Fandi89 (talk) 05:49, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - it has No significant coverege on independent relieble sources , therefore NO evidence of Notability , Samat lib (talk) 22:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete I voted for a delete and the change was deleted by a sock puppet account. If there is more notability coverage for the company than it can stay otherwise it is not up to Wikipedia standards. Eric Carr (talk) 23:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- I removed your !vote because it was an unsubstantiated accusation and personal attack against another editor. You are allowed, of course, to !vote "delete". However, given that these appear to be the accepted national charts for Malaysia, and the parent organization was nearly unanimously kept, what Wikipedia standards is it not up to? 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:10, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: extending discussion to allow Eric Carr a chance to respond with his reasoning, when he comes off block.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisting comment: extending discussion to allow Eric Carr a chance to respond with his reasoning, when he comes off block.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:17, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Several refs are Facebook links, primary sources. Not notable. Vikram Vincent 07:09, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.