Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarang school

Sarang school

Sarang school (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would like to request that this article be considered for deletion. It appears to lack sufficient significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to establish notability (per WP:GNG and WP:ORG). The existing references seem limited and may not demonstrate in-depth, secondary coverage.

Additionally, parts of the article read in a potentially promotional tone, raising concerns about neutrality (WP:NPOV). The article was created by User:Saranghills, and there may be a possible connection to the subject, which could indicate a conflict of interest.

As an unregistered user, I am unable to initiate an Articles for Deletion discussion. Could an experienced editor please review this and consider starting an AfD if appropriate?

~2026-18300-09 (talk) 12:00, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

• Comment - Completing nomination on behalf of temp account--above text is copied from this page's talk page. I am neutral at this time. --Finngall ^talk 19:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools, Kerala, Education, and India.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:42, 24 March 2026 (UTC)
• Keep: The current sources in the article have plenty of SIGCOV to suggest standalone notability, meeting GNG and WP:NSCHOOL requirements. Besides, a quick Gsearch yielded case studies about the school like this one - , which has detailed SIGCOV. Concerns about promotional tone should be addressed through editing, cuz AFD ain't clean-up after all. BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:34, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

• Strong keep This school is a non-profit institution and one of a kind. It has adequate referencing and third party media coverage (SIGCOV). Promotional tone, if present, may be removed through competent editing. jojo@nthony (talk) 05:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

• Delete: The article is completely promotional and the article is created by the owner. ~2026-19267-95 (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

  This article was created by me and I am neither the owner of the school nor has anything to do with it. Wikipedia contributions of the temporary user (~2026-18300-09) who proposed the deletion and the temporary user (~2026-19267-95) who supported the deletion are only related to the deletion of this article. It appears that the proposal stems from personal differences. jojo@nthony (talk) 14:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  And I don't think being created by the owner is actually a strong rationale for deletion either. It will just be overlooked by stronger rationales based on policies like WP:GNG. Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:09, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

To all of the above, please assume good faith. I see no obvious evidence of conflict of interest by the article creator, and zero evidence that the temp accounts are motivated by "personal differences". Please keep your arguments to actual Wikipedia policies and guidelines. --Finngall ^talk 17:59, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

• Keep per BhikhariInformer. The school has received plenty of coverage, even the sources in the article are enough to meet GNG, but more is available as shown above. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:07, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.