Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Molson Canadian Theatre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:CSK; nominator withdrawl. Goldsztajn (talk) 08:30, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
The Show Theatre
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Molson Canadian Theatre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable for its own standalone page. Several sources barely focus on the actual theatre and rather the casino itself. Furthermore, the majority of the claims on this page are unverifiable and are likely original research. While I did find sources supporting the casino's 2006 expansion, the specific opening date of "September 16" is not supported. Aspifi (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related AfD discussions. Aspifi (talk) 16:41, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related AfD discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 17:37, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the list of Music-related AfD discussions. Bridget (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment I suppose this could be merged to Great Canadian Casino Vancouver without losing much, but multiple articles in a regional paper about the building's name changes suggest some notability. Not sure what is supposed to be unverifiable here. The September date is easily verifiable on search engines, suggesting an inadequate BEFORE.—BrechtBro (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comment Nominator closed this as speedy keep due to withdrawal, but close was malformed, I've reverted and will reclose. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 08:24, 25 August 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.