Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your AI Slop Bores Me
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. It's SNOW-ing, so closing slightly early. λ NegativeMP1 16:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Your AI Slop Bores Me
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Your AI Slop Bores Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I propose merging this into AI slop because I don't think the website "Your AI Slop Bores Me" is notable enough for a standalone page, but the content we have here could be a section on the AI slop page. The new page patroller stated on the talk page that they thought the page's creator should "add more sources and establish notability," so I don't think I'm alone in the opinion. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 00:16, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Video games, Social science, Artificial intelligence, and Websites. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:59, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep Seems pretty clearly notable and is unrelated to AI besides the title of the website. No obvious reason to merge. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:58, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep why would we merge a satirisation of something into the thing it is satirising Finnfrog99 (talk) 12:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- yeah definitely keep, found more sources
- https://www.ndsmcobserver.com/article/2026/04/human-ingenuity-thrives-in-your-ai-slop-bores-me
- https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1400113-your-ai-slop-bores-me-website-is-breaking-internet-heres-why
- https://gizmodo.com/your-ai-slop-bores-me-gives-you-a-chance-to-see-how-the-sausage-is-made-2000732431
- https://thebakerorange.com/47965/showcase/your-ai-slop-bores-me/
- https://www.npr.org/2026/04/14/nx-s1-5776842/ai-chatbot-comedy-ben-palmer-chatgpt
- https://www.michigandaily.com/arts/digital-culture/your-ai-slop-bores-me-is-charmingly-human/
- https://kotaku.com/ai-llm-slop-new-free-game-2000677087
- WP:GIZMODO
- WP:KOTAKU Finnfrog99 (talk) 12:20, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment: I haven't looked through all of these sources yet, but it looks like several are less than ideal. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 23:36, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- still, atleast some of these further show notability, even if some arent ideal Finnfrog99 (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- While that is true, I've recently found that people will spam every source available on a topic under discussion. The work of figuring out if the sources are bad is left to others, which most aren't going to do. Then, when people point out bad sources in a discussion, it takes up a lot of the discussion time, and those pointing them out are made to look unreasonable or pedantic. Generally, would like to see it become the norm to exclude source lists unless the editor is willing to stand by the reliability of all of them. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 23:50, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- still, atleast some of these further show notability, even if some arent ideal Finnfrog99 (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- yeah definitely keep, found more sources
- Keep, as the creator of the article, I don't see any reason to merge an article for a notable subject that is separate/standalone from the subject it is satirizing. Closedsrc (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per Finnfrog99 sources and sources already in article. ~ A412 talk! 17:29, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose merge as not a natural target, so if not keep, it's delete. Geschichte (talk) 21:02, 2 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep Adequate sourcing per Finnfrog. I don't see the need for a merge. toby (t)(c)(rw) 03:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep - per Finnfrog99. Sources found allows article to comfortably exist on its own and pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep: easily meets GNG and WP:THREE, also I don't see how merging this into AI slop would make much sense anyway. Gommeh (talk! sign!) 15:13, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep, meets WP:GNG and it's parodying AI chatbots, not AI slop. --Belbury (talk) 15:19, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
- Keep - the game has not only garnered coverage in the in the video game industry websites, but even more general coverage, like NPR. It looks like we're heading towards keep at this point, but if things change down the line, I agree with others that AI slop is not a great redirect/merge target. Sergecross73 msg me 15:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.