Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2050 FIFA World Cup
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Star Mississippi 02:54, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Draft:2050 FIFA World Cup
Event scheduled for 24 years in the future, Wikipedia is not a WP:CRYSTALBALL. ShadowBallX (talk) 04:31, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ignore per WP:NDRAFT. The draft is declined. The author is blocked. Processing these a third way is a net negative, busy work. A purpose of draftspace is to contain junk from the rest of the project, and you bringing these to MfD defeats that purpose. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:20, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per SmokeyJoe. Outside of disruption such as being tenditiously resubmitted to AFC with no improvement, it costs less community time to let these be deleted via G13 than to discuss them here. Leave useless drafts alone. Chess enjoyer (talk) 05:35, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Keep per Chess enjoyer and WP:RAG. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 09:14, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- Weak Keep as per Leave Useless Drafts Alone. If submitted, should be rejected. If submitted repeatedly, may be deleted, but only then. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
- Maybe this could've been bundled. The nomination reasoning and the !votes are the same. Ha. Keep per WP:LUDA. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:55, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.