Zotmund

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The sinking of the imperial ships at Pressburg by Zotmund, depicted in the Illuminated Chronicle

Zotmund, also known as Kund the Diver (Hungarian: Búvár Kund), was a Hungarian soldier and folk hero in the 11th century. When the Holy Roman Empire attacked the Kingdom of Hungary and laid siege to Pressburg (present-day Bratislava, Slovakia) in the summer of 1052, Zotmund dived into the Danube and scuttled the German ships, saving the castle from siege. His exploit was celebrated in later songs and works.

According to the lexicon Magyar utónévkönyv, the name Zotmund (also Zothmund or Zottmund) was of Germanic origin and explains its meaning by combining the words "fast" and "protection".[1] Historian Gyula Pauler also thought his name was of German origin, but it did not necessarily refer to his ethnicity.[2] Hungarian historian Csete Katona considered that the name Zotmund was of Old Norse origin, therefore it is possible that he was one of the Varangian mercenaries who served at the royal court of King Andrew I of Hungary. Later variants of the chronicle text – the 15th-century Csepregi Codex and the 16th-century Béldi Codex – spell his name as "Zothmond". Katona argued the name Zotmund is a result of a possible distortion; the original word form may also be the same as the Old Norse name Thodmund (Þjóðmundr), Sudmund (Suðmundr), or Solmund (Sólmundr).[3] Amidst the wave of Magyarization, there were attempts to demonstrate the Hungarian origin of the name – "Szótmond" – in the second half of the 19th century.[4]

Zotmund's ethnicity is strengthened by the fact that swimming and diving (which were not sharply separated at that time) had particularly distinguished role in the Scandinavian military culture and the sagas of Icelanders presented them as noble military virtues.[5]

Heroism

For the aforesaid king [Henry III] had come by boat to lay siege to the castle of Poson [Pressburg]; but the Hungarians who were in the castle found a man, Zotmund by name, who was a most skillful swimmer, and in the night they sent him silently to the emperor's ships, and swimming under water he made holes in all the ships, so that they immediately filled with water. Thus the power of the Germans was broken and, weakened and enervated, they returned home.

Since the early 1030s, with the emergion of the imperial Salian dynasty, the Holy Roman Empire had attempted to extend its influence over the Kingdom of Hungary. After their protege Peter was dethroned in 1046, the relationship between the two realms was constantly hostile. Under the reign of Andrew I, skirmishes on the frontier between Hungary and the Holy Roman Empire first occurred in 1050. Emperor Henry III invaded Hungary in August 1051, but Andrew and his younger brother Béla successfully applied scorched earth tactics against the imperial troops and forced them to withdraw at the Vértes Hills. Andrew initiated new peace negotiations with Henry and promised to pay an annual tribute, but his offers were refused. In the summer of 1052, the imperial army returned to Hungary and laid siege to Pressburg. According to the chronicle, this is where Zotmund's heroic deed took place, as a result of which the Germans suspended the siege and left Hungary.[7]

Since only the 89th chapter of the Illuminated Chronicle reports on Zotmund's exploits, its details and veracity are disputed among historians. The contemporaneous Hermann of Reichenau and Annales Altahenses also mention the imperial campaign into Hungary, but they know nothing about Zotmund's action.[8] The aforementioned chronicler Hermann writes that Henry III "laid siege to the fortress of Pressburg and for a long time attacked it with various machines of war. Since, however, God aided the besieged, who anxiously called on Him, his efforts were always frustrated and he could by no means capture it".[9] The Annales Altahenses sees the mediation of Pope Leo IX behind the lifting of the siege.[10] Among German works, only the 16th-century Bavarian Humanist chronicler Johannes Aventinus mentions the sinking of German ships by Zotmund, but Aventinus utilized the Hungarian chronicles to a large extent in his work.[11] Based on these narrations, the German-language historiography – apart from the synthesis of Johann Christian von Engel from 1813 – often ignored the account in the Illuminated Chronicle, considering Zotmund's deed as a mythical element.[8]

Depiction of a sea battle, in the water with a diver committing sabotage, from a 13th-century copy of Oppian's Cynegetica

Hungarian historiography is much more divided on the issue; historians György Szabados and Csaba Szabó accepted the narration of the Hungarian chronicle as authentic,[12] which can also be confirmed by the fact that the names appearing in the chapter, with the exception of Zotmund and another warrior, possibly of Varangian origin, Vilungard, appear in the contemporary establishing charter of the abbey of Tihany (1055).[13] On the other hand, the Hungarian chronicle contains chronological inaccuracies regarding the 1051–1052 campaign, and the chronicler reversed the chronological order of several events. László Veszprémy considered that the description of the diving feat of Zotmund most likely comes from a chronicler who wrote much later than the events (based on his style, in the early 13th century), and who may have commented on and expanded on the contemporary but brief, annalistic account of the sinking of the German ships.[14] Csete Katona pointed out that if the story were fictional, the chronicler would not have chosen a foreign-sounding name.[15]

Underwater archaeologist Oszkár Csepregi considered that, after Henry III and Andrew I concluded a peace through the mediation of Pope Leo IX, the end of the campaign provided the basis for sinking the ships, and they were sunk by the Germans themselves: upstream, in critical circumstances, the imperial army did not attempt to tow them, but rather left them to their fate, rendering the ships unusable so that the enemy could not acquire them (The Germans did the same thing during the unsuccessful campaign of 1074). Csepregi claimed that temporal, physiological and technical factors rule out the possibility that Zotmund alone would have drilled the ships anchored in front of the castle. Csepregi argued that Zotmund only served as a messenger, often swimming across the Danube to deliver messages between the castle and Duke Béla's military camp located nearby.[16][17] In contrast, Katona argued that the act of sinking enemy ships was not an uncommon tactic during the Middle Ages, and divers had been performing military tasks since ancient times. Moreover, swimming and "diving" had a particularly distinguished role among the Scandinavians of the time. The wording of the chronicle, according to which the Hungarians defending the castle "found" (invenerunt) a person skilled in diving, also suggests that this skill was not widespread in their own circles, which may confirm the Nordic (Varangian) origin of Zotmund.[18]

Cultural legacy

References

Sources

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI