2014 South Dakota Public Utilities Commission election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2014 South Dakota Public Utilities Commission election was held on November 4, 2014, to elect one of three members of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission. Incumbent Republican Gary Hanson was re-elected to a third term in office, defeating Democratic challenger David Allen in a landslide.[1]

Quick facts Candidate, Party ...
2014 South Dakota Public Utilities Commission election

 2012
November 4, 2014 (2014-11-04)
2016 
 2008
2020 
 
Candidate Gary Hanson David Allen
Party Republican Democratic
Popular vote 167,726 74,824
Percentage 65.73% 29.32%

County results
Hanson:      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%
Allen:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%

Public Utilities Commissioner before election

Gary Hanson
Republican

Elected Public Utilities Commissioner

Gary Hanson
Republican

Close

Republican primary

Candidates

Nominee

  • Gary Hanson, incumbent public utilities commissioner (2003–present)[2]

Democratic primary

Candidates

Nominee

Declined

Constitution primary

Candidates

Nominee

  • Wayne Schmidt[3]

General election

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
2014 South Dakota Public Utilities Commission election[4]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Gary Hanson (incumbent) 167,726 65.73%
Democratic David Allen 74,824 29.32%
Constitution Wayne Schmidt 12,642 4.95%
Total votes 255,192 100.00%
Republican hold
Close

By county

More information County, Gary Hanson Republican ...
County[4] Gary Hanson
Republican
David Allen
Democratic
Wayne Schmidt
Constitution
Margin Total
# % # % # % # %
Aurora 680 64.39% 330 31.25% 46 4.36% 350 33.14% 1,056
Beadle 3,476 66.02% 1,577 29.95% 212 4.03% 1,899 36.07% 5,265
Bennett 438 51.96% 336 39.86% 69 8.19% 102 12.10% 843
Bon Homme 1,378 62.72% 702 31.95% 117 5.33% 676 30.77% 2,197
Brookings 5,253 62.69% 2,709 32.33% 417 4.98% 2,544 30.36% 8,379
Brown 6,543 59.41% 3,982 36.16% 488 4.43% 2,561 23.25% 11,013
Brule 1,099 67.22% 452 27.65% 84 5.14% 647 39.57% 1,635
Buffalo 129 30.00% 284 66.05% 17 3.95% -155 -36.05% 430
Butte 2,109 71.27% 585 19.77% 265 8.96% 1,524 51.50% 2,959
Campbell 473 80.44% 81 13.78% 34 5.78% 392 66.67% 588
Charles Mix 1,763 59.76% 1,089 36.92% 98 3.32% 674 22.85% 2,950
Clark 946 68.85% 360 26.20% 68 4.95% 586 42.65% 1,374
Clay 1,753 51.73% 1,518 44.79% 118 3.48% 235 6.93% 3,389
Codington 5,516 66.64% 2,393 28.91% 368 4.45% 3,123 37.73% 8,277
Corson 385 44.00% 412 47.09% 78 8.91% -27 -3.09% 875
Custer 2,247 66.26% 870 25.66% 274 8.08% 1,377 40.61% 3,391
Davison 3,677 65.32% 1,745 31.00% 207 3.68% 1,932 34.32% 5,629
Day 1,272 57.82% 832 37.82% 96 4.36% 440 20.00% 2,200
Deuel 1,014 62.59% 498 30.74% 108 6.67% 516 31.85% 1,620
Dewey 437 32.35% 819 60.62% 95 7.03% -382 -28.28% 1,351
Douglas 1,004 83.39% 170 14.12% 30 2.49% 834 69.27% 1,204
Edmunds 1,042 67.93% 402 26.21% 90 5.87% 640 41.72% 1,534
Fall River 1,730 65.11% 713 26.83% 214 8.05% 1,017 38.28% 2,657
Faulk 568 70.56% 200 24.84% 37 4.60% 368 45.71% 805
Grant 1,679 64.50% 796 30.58% 128 4.92% 883 33.92% 2,603
Gregory 1,200 71.22% 425 25.22% 60 3.56% 775 45.99% 1,685
Haakon 656 82.41% 106 13.32% 34 4.27% 550 69.10% 796
Hamlin 1,506 73.54% 446 21.78% 96 4.69% 1,060 51.76% 2,048
Hand 992 70.11% 385 27.21% 38 2.69% 607 42.90% 1,415
Hanson 862 70.31% 325 26.51% 39 3.18% 537 43.80% 1,226
Harding 445 80.32% 65 11.73% 44 7.94% 380 68.59% 554
Hughes 4,995 75.85% 1,348 20.47% 242 3.68% 3,647 55.38% 6,585
Hutchinson 2,011 79.27% 438 17.26% 88 3.47% 1,573 62.00% 2,537
Hyde 414 73.40% 125 22.16% 25 4.43% 289 51.24% 564
Jackson 528 62.71% 268 31.83% 46 5.46% 260 30.88% 842
Jerauld 505 65.33% 239 30.92% 29 3.75% 266 34.41% 773
Jones 359 80.67% 64 14.38% 22 4.94% 295 66.29% 445
Kingsbury 1,338 69.04% 534 27.55% 66 3.41% 804 41.49% 1,938
Lake 2,885 65.99% 1,280 29.28% 207 4.73% 1,605 36.71% 4,372
Lawrence 5,203 64.06% 2,367 29.14% 552 6.80% 2,836 34.92% 8,122
Lincoln 11,817 75.27% 3,304 21.05% 578 3.68% 8,513 54.23% 15,699
Lyman 765 65.95% 330 28.45% 65 5.60% 435 37.50% 1,160
Marshall 909 57.03% 628 39.40% 57 3.58% 281 17.63% 1,594
McCook 1,333 69.97% 466 24.46% 106 5.56% 867 45.51% 1,905
McPherson 752 80.17% 142 15.14% 44 4.69% 610 65.03% 938
Meade 5,235 68.83% 1,783 23.44% 588 7.73% 3,452 45.39% 7,606
Mellette 325 51.83% 246 39.23% 56 8.93% 79 12.60% 627
Miner 503 64.57% 246 31.58% 30 3.85% 257 32.99% 779
Minnehaha 34,129 68.23% 13,852 27.69% 2,040 4.08% 20,277 40.54% 50,021
Moody 1,334 60.66% 755 34.33% 110 5.00% 579 26.33% 2,199
Pennington 19,852 65.30% 8,660 28.48% 1,891 6.22% 11,192 36.81% 30,403
Perkins 853 70.91% 239 19.87% 111 9.23% 614 51.04% 1,203
Potter 826 76.62% 183 16.98% 69 6.40% 643 59.65% 1,078
Roberts 1,699 56.22% 1,229 40.67% 94 3.11% 470 15.55% 3,022
Sanborn 519 65.04% 233 29.20% 46 5.76% 286 35.84% 798
Shannon 241 9.40% 2,185 85.19% 139 5.42% -1,944 -75.79% 2,565
Spink 1,470 63.42% 782 33.74% 66 2.85% 688 29.68% 2,318
Stanley 884 72.40% 280 22.93% 57 4.67% 604 49.47% 1,221
Sully 510 77.98% 117 17.89% 27 4.13% 393 60.09% 654
Todd 433 21.20% 1,466 71.79% 143 7.00% -1,033 -50.59% 2,042
Tripp 1,531 74.03% 448 21.66% 89 4.30% 1,083 52.37% 2,068
Turner 2,376 76.33% 607 19.50% 130 4.18% 1,769 56.83% 3,113
Union 3,311 69.57% 1,233 25.91% 215 4.52% 2,078 43.66% 4,759
Walworth 1,280 70.41% 314 17.27% 224 12.32% 966 53.14% 1,818
Yankton 4,080 59.08% 2,522 36.52% 304 4.40% 1,558 22.56% 6,906
Ziebach 249 42.93% 304 52.41% 27 4.66% -55 -9.48% 580
Totals167,72665.73%74,82429.32%12,6424.95%92,90236.40%255,192
Close

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI