Wikiwand AI

2016 United States Senate election in North Dakota

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2016 United States Senate election in North Dakota was held November 8, 2016, to elect a member of the United States Senate to represent the State of North Dakota, concurrently with the 2016 U.S. presidential election, as well as other elections to the United States Senate in other states and elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. The primaries were held June 14.

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...
2016 United States Senate election in North Dakota

 2010
November 8, 2016
2022 
 
Nominee John Hoeven Eliot Glassheim
Party Republican Democratic–NPL
Popular vote 268,788 58,116
Percentage 78.48% 16.97%

Hoeven:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Glassheim:      50–60%      60–70%

U.S. senator before election

John Hoeven
Republican

Elected U.S. Senator

John Hoeven
Republican

Close

Incumbent Republican Senator John Hoeven won re-election to a second term with 78.5% of the vote, the largest margin in the state's history.[1] Hoeven became the first Republican senator to be re-elected from North Dakota since 1974.

Republican primary

Candidates

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Republican primary results[2]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican John Hoeven (incumbent) 103,677 99.57%
Republican Write-in 445 0.43%
Total votes 104,122 100.00%
Close

Democratic-NPL primary

Candidates

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Democratic-NPL primary results[2]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic–NPL Eliot Glassheim 17,243 99.72%
Democratic–NPL Write-in 48 0.28%
Total votes 17,291 100.00%
Close

Libertarian Party

Candidates

  • Robert Marquette[4]
More information Party, Candidate ...
Libertarian primary results[2]
Party Candidate Votes %
Libertarian Robert Marquette 1,089 99.54%
Libertarian Write-in 5 0.46%
Total votes 1,094 100.00%
Close

General election

Debates

More information Dates, Location ...
Dates Location Hoeven Glassheim Marquette Link
October 13, 2016 Bismarck, North Dakota Participant Participant Participant [5]
Close

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...
Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[6] Safe R November 2, 2016
Sabato's Crystal Ball[7] Safe R November 7, 2016
Rothenberg Political Report[8] Safe R November 3, 2016
Daily Kos[9] Safe R November 8, 2016
Real Clear Politics[10] Safe R November 7, 2016
Close

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
John
Hoeven (R)
Eliot
Glassheim (D)
Undecided
SurveyMonkey[11] November 1–7, 2016 313 ± 4.6% 74% 23% 3%
SurveyMonkey[12] October 31–November 6, 2016 288 ± 4.6% 73% 24% 3%
SurveyMonkey[13] October 28–November 3, 2016 276 ± 4.6% 74% 24% 2%
SurveyMonkey[14] October 27–November 2, 2016 260 ± 4.6% 72% 24% 4%
SurveyMonkey[15] October 26–November 1, 2016 254 ± 4.6% 72% 25% 3%
SurveyMonkey[16] October 25–31, 2016 279 ± 4.6% 71% 27% 2%
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
United States Senate election in North Dakota, 2016[17]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican John Hoeven (incumbent) 268,788 78.48% +2.40%
Democratic–NPL Eliot Glassheim 58,116 16.97% −5.20%
Libertarian Robert Marquette 10,556 3.08% +1.45%
Independent James Germalic 4,675 1.36% N/A
Write-in 366 0.11% N/A
Total votes 342,501 100.00% N/A
Republican hold
Close

By county

More information County, John Hoeven Republican ...
County John Hoeven
Republican
Eliot Glassheim
Democratic–NPL
All others Margin Total
votes
# % # % # % # %
Adams 1,067 87.2% 114 9.3% 42 3.5% 953 77.9% 1,223
Barnes 4,302 80.6% 835 15.6% 201 3.7% 3,467 65.0% 5,338
Benson 1,340 66.3% 574 28.4% 3108 5.4% 766 37.9% 2,022
Billings 543 89.8% 43 7.1% 19 3.1% 500 82.7% 605
Bottineau 2,998 85.7% 383 10.9% 118 3.4% 2,615 74.8% 3,499
Bowman 1,605 89.5% 136 7.6% 53 2.9% 1,469 81.9% 1,794
Burke 970 91.9% 66 6.3% 19 1.8% 904 85.6% 1,055
Burleigh 38,830 81.2% 6,904 14.4% 2,097 4.4% 31,926 66.8% 47,831
Cass 57,151 71.6% 18,268 22.9% 4,403 5.6% 38,883 48.7% 79,822
Cavalier 1,707 83.3% 290 14.2% 51 2.5% 1,417 69.1% 2,048
Dickey 2,022 83.2% 335 13.8% 74 3.1% 1,687 72.4% 2,431
Divide 1,039 84.5% 140 11.4% 51 4.1% 899 73.1% 1,230
Dunn 1,909 85.5% 251 11.2% 73 3.3% 1,658 74.3% 2,233
Eddy 962 78.5% 219 17.9% 45 3.7% 743 60.6% 1,226
Emmons 1,774 89.7% 136 6.9% 68 3.5% 1,638 82.8% 1,978
Foster 1,491 85.5% 170 9.8% 82 4.7% 1,321 75.7% 1,743
Golden Valley 857 89.6% 62 6.5% 37 3.8% 795 83.1% 956
Grand Forks 20,860 69.9% 7,714 25.9% 1,266 4.3% 13,146 44.0% 29,840
Grant 1,251 89.0% 108 7.7% 47 3.4% 1,143 81.3% 1,406
Griggs 1,046 81.7% 194 15.1% 41 3.2% 852 66.3% 1,281
Hettinger 1,160 89.5% 88 6.8% 48 3.7% 1,072 82.7% 1,296
Kidder 1,224 87.6% 117 8.4% 57 4.1% 1,107 69.2% 1,398
LaMoure 1,818 83.3% 292 13.4% 72 3.2% 1,526 69.9% 2,182
Logan 989 90.6% 72 6.6% 31 2.8% 917 84.0% 1,092
McHenry 2,433 85.2% 296 10.4% 127 4.4% 2,137 74.8% 2,856
McIntosh 1,327 90.1% 110 7.5% 36 2.5% 1,217 82.6% 1,473
McKenzie 3,903 84.8% 494 10.7% 208 4.4% 3,409 74.1% 4,605
McLean 4,391 82.3% 2,104 13.4% 689 4.0% 3,659 68.9% 5,336
Mercer 4,041 86.4% 470 10.0% 166 3.5% 3,571 76.4% 4,677
Morton 12,963 82.3% 2,104 13.4% 689 5.3% 10,859 68.9% 15,756
Mountrail 1,980 73.0% 892 21.8% 211 5.1% 2,088 51.2% 4,083
Nelson 1,343 76.7% 323 18.5% 84 4.8% 1,020 58.2% 1,750
Oliver 915 89.3% 74 7.2% 36 3.5% 841 82.1% 1,025
Pembina 2,644 83.0% 453 14.2% 87 2.7% 2,191 68.8% 3,184
Pierce 1,816 86.7% 225 10.7% 55 2.4% 1,591 76.0% 2,094
Ramsey 4,291 79.9% 869 16.2% 208 3.9% 3,422 63.7% 5,368
Ransom 1,793 75.7% 463 19.6% 112 4.7% 3,422 56.1% 5,368
Renville 1,140 88.2% 104 8.0% 49 3.9% 1,036 80.2% 1,293
Richland 6,074 80.3% 1,117 14.8% 371 4.9% 4,957 65.5% 7,562
Rolette 1,801 48.3% 1,701 45.7% 224 6.0% 100 2.6% 3,726
Sargent 1,513 74.8% 423 20.9% 88 4.3% 1,090 53.9% 2,024
Sheridan 703 88.8% 60 7.6% 29 3.6% 634 81.2% 792
Sioux 426 35.7% 633 53.1% 133 11.2% -207 -17.4% 1,192
Slope 388 90.7% 25 5.8% 15 3.4% 363 84.9% 428
Stark 10,635 87.2% 1,101 9.0% 464 3.8% 9,534 78.2% 12,200
Steele 791 76.6% 204 19.8% 37 3.6% 587 56.8% 1,032
Stutsman 8,392 83.2% 1,329 13.2% 366 3.7% 7,063 70.0% 10,087
Towner 952 80.9% 179 15.2% 46 3.9% 773 65.7% 1,177
Traill 3,062 77.4% 747 18.9% 148 3.8% 2,315 58.5% 3,958
Walsh 3,788 80.5% 749 15.9% 171 3.7% 3,039 64.6% 4,708
Ward 22,538 82.8% 3,309 12.2% 1,378 5.0% 19,229 70.6% 27,225
Wells 2,080 86.8% 239 10.0% 78 3.3% 1,841 76.8% 2,397
Williams 10,750 85.3% 1,180 9.4% 666 5.3% 9,570 75.9% 12,596
Totals 268,788 78.5% 58,116 17.0% 15,597 4.6% 210,672 61.5% 342,501
Close

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks