2020 Colorado Proposition EE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposition EE
Taxes on Nicotine Products
Results
Choice
Votes %
Yes 2,134,608 67.56%
No 1,025,182 32.44%
Valid votes 3,159,790 95.88%
Invalid or blank votes 135,876 4.12%
Total votes 3,295,666 100.00%
Registered voters/turnout 3,793,790 86.87%

Source: Colorado Public Radio[1]

Colorado Proposition EE (also the Taxes on Nicotine Products Proposition) was a legislative referendum that appeared on ballots in Colorado in the November 2020 elections. It was a proposal to increase taxes on nicotine products and place a new tax on vaping products.

Proposition EE originates from HB20-1427, a law that would increase taxes on cigarettes and nicotine products. As all tax increases have to be approved by voters under the Colorado Constitution, a Proposition was needed for the law to enter into effect.[2]

The Proposition raises taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products, and levies a new tax on nicotine products. Under the proposal, these increases would be phased in between 2021 and 2027, resulting in a tax on cigarettes of $2.64 per pack (up from $0.84), a tax on other tobacco products of 62% of the price which they are sold to retailers at (up from 40%) and a new tax on nicotine products, also set at 62%. Additionally, the Proposition raised the minimum sale price of various nicotine products.[2]

It is estimated that Proposition EE would generate up to $175.6m extra tax in its first budget year, rising to $275.9m by the time the new rates are fully in place. This would be used to increase funding for free preschool provision (an election pledge of Governor Jared Polis)[3] as well as being used in rural schools, K-12 education, housing development, and general state spending.[2]

Campaign

Support

HB20-1427, the legislation which put Proposition EE on the ballot, was sponsored by Representatives Yadira Caraveo and Julie McCluskie and Senators Rhonda Fields and Dominick Moreno.[4]

Endorsements

Opposition

Opposition to Proposition EE mainly centered around opposition to increasing taxes in general but specifically because the Proposition was seen to be a sin tax. It was also noted by progressive groups who opposed the Proposition, such as the Working Families Party, that it would disproportionately affect poorer and working-class people, because they were more targeted by tobacco companies.[26]

Endorsements

'No'

State legislators

Local politicians

Newspapers

Organisations

Neutral

Results

See also

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI