Wikiwand AI

2022 United States Senate election in Arkansas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2022 United States Senate election in Arkansas was held on November 8, 2022, to elect a member to the United States Senate to represent the state of Arkansas. Incumbent Republican Senator John Boozman ran for a third term.[1] He won the May 24, 2022 Republican primary with 58.03% of the vote and the general election with 65.73% of the vote.[2]

Quick facts Turnout, Nominee ...
2022 United States Senate election in Arkansas

← 2016
November 8, 2022 (2022-11-08)
2028 →
Turnout50.81% Decrease
 
Nominee John Boozman Natalie James
Party Republican Democratic
Popular vote 592,437 280,187
Percentage 65.73% 31.09%

Boozman:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%
James:      50–60%

U.S. senator before election

John Boozman
Republican

Elected U.S. senator

John Boozman
Republican

Close

This was the best performance for a Republican senator in the state's history, and was the first time for either U.S. Senate seat in Arkansas that Republicans won three consecutive elections.

Republican primary

Incumbent senator John Boozman ran with the endorsement of former President Donald Trump. However, he attracted multiple opponents from the right who questioned his loyalty to Trump, attacking him for refusing to object to the results of the 2020 United States presidential election.[3] Despite it being his first time running for office, former NFL football player Jake Bequette and his supporting groups raised over $2.6 million.[4] Boozman ultimately won with 58% of the vote, easily avoiding a runoff.

Candidates

Nominee

Eliminated in primary

Withdrew

  • Michael Deel, corporate analyst[8]

Endorsements

John Boozman
Jake Bequette

U.S. representatives

Fundraising

More information Campaign finance reports as of May 4, 2022, Candidate ...
Campaign finance reports as of May 4, 2022
Candidate Raised Spent Cash on hand
John Boozman (R) $5,515,449 $4,930,354 $1,580,776
Jake Bequette (R) $1,262,746 $875,103 $375,720
Source: Federal Election Commission[16]
Close

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
Jake
Bequette
John
Boozman
Heath
Loftis
Jan
Morgan
Undecided
Hendrix College[17] May 2, 2022 802 (LV) ± 4.3% 19% 45% 2% 17% 18%
Close

Results

Results by county:
  Boozman
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  •   70–80%
More information Party, Candidate ...
Republican primary results[18]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican John Boozman (incumbent) 201,677 58.03%
Republican Jake Bequette 71,809 20.66%
Republican Jan Morgan 65,958 18.98%
Republican Heath Loftis 8,112 2.33%
Total votes 347,556 100.0%
Close

Democratic primary

Candidates

Nominee

  • Natalie James, realtor[19]

Eliminated in primary

  • Jack Foster, former Pine Bluff city alderman[20]
  • Dan Whitfield, activist and Independent candidate that failed to make the ballot for the U.S. Senate in 2020[21]

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
Jack
Foster
Natalie
James
Dan
Whitfield
Undecided
Hendrix College[17] May 2, 2022 597 (LV) ± 5.0% 5% 17% 15% 63%
Close

Results

Results by county:
  James
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  James/Whitfield tie
  •   40–50%
  Whitfield
  •   30–40%
  •   40–50%
  •   50–60%
  Foster
  •   30–40%
  •   50–60%
More information Party, Candidate ...
Democratic primary results[18]
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Natalie James 49,722 54.09%
Democratic Dan Whitfield 28,319 30.80%
Democratic Jack Foster 13,891 15.11%
Total votes 91,932 100.0%
Close

Libertarian convention

Candidates

Nominated at convention

  • Kenneth Cates, firefighter[22]

General election

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...
Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[23] Solid R March 4, 2022
Inside Elections[24] Solid R April 1, 2022
Sabato's Crystal Ball[25] Safe R March 1, 2022
Politico[26] Solid R April 1, 2022
RCP[27] Safe R February 24, 2022
Fox News[28] Solid R May 12, 2022
DDHQ[29] Solid R July 20, 2022
538[30] Solid R June 30, 2022
The Economist[31] Safe R September 7, 2022
Close

Post-primary endorsements

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[a]
Margin
of error
John
Boozman (R)
Natalie
James (D)
Other Undecided
Hendrix College[35] September 12, 2022 835 (LV) ± 3.8% 44% 31% 5%[b] 21%
Echelon Insights[36] August 31 – September 7, 2022 382 (RV) ± 7.7% 56% 32% – 12%
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
2022 United States Senate election in Arkansas[37]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican John Boozman (incumbent) 592,437 65.73% +5.96%
Democratic Natalie James 280,187 31.09% −5.08%
Libertarian Kenneth Cates 28,682 3.18% −0.78%
Total votes 901,306 100.00% N/A
Republican hold
Close

By county

More information County, John Boozman Republican ...
County[37] John Boozman
Republican
Natalie James
Democratic
Kenneth Cates
Libertarian
Margin Total
# % # % # % # %
Arkansas 3,342 74.95% 1,012 22.70% 105 2.35% 2,330 52.25% 4,459
Ashley 4,103 75.51% 1,251 23.02% 80 1.47% 2,852 52.48% 5,434
Baxter 12,207 78.30% 2,940 18.86% 443 2.84% 9,267 59.44% 15,590
Benton 58,938 65.08% 28,336 31.29% 3,288 3.63% 30,602 33.79% 90,562
Boone 10,174 80.20% 1,979 15.60% 533 4.20% 8,195 64.60% 12,686
Bradley 1,824 69.70% 730 27.89% 63 2.41% 1,094 41.80% 2,617
Calhoun 1,269 80.16% 281 17.75% 33 2.08% 988 62.41% 1,583
Carroll 5,867 64.98% 2,835 31.40% 327 3.62% 3,032 33.58% 9,029
Chicot 1,687 49.90% 1,653 48.89% 41 1.21% 34 1.01% 3,381
Clark 3,685 60.36% 2,267 37.13% 153 2.51% 1,418 23.23% 6,105
Clay 3,080 78.63% 698 17.82% 139 3.55% 2,382 60.81% 3,917
Cleburne 8,336 83.14% 1,342 13.39% 348 3.47% 6,994 69.76% 10,026
Cleveland 2,343 84.04% 380 13.63% 65 2.33% 1,963 70.41% 2,788
Columbia 4,177 69.01% 1,752 28.94% 124 2.05% 2,425 40.06% 6,053
Conway 4,648 69.21% 1,856 27.64% 212 3.16% 2,792 41.57% 6,716
Craighead 18,697 67.78% 7,882 28.58% 1,004 3.64% 10,815 39.21% 27,583
Crawford 13,894 78.59% 3,125 17.68% 660 3.73% 10,769 60.91% 17,679
Crittenden 5,436 51.07% 4,999 46.96% 210 1.97% 437 4.11% 10,645
Cross 3,707 75.58% 1,079 22.00% 119 2.43% 2,628 53.58% 4,905
Dallas 1,366 66.50% 630 30.67% 58 2.82% 736 35.83% 2,054
Desha 1,647 54.64% 1,296 43.00% 71 2.36% 351 11.65% 3,014
Drew 3,525 67.19% 1,632 31.11% 89 1.70% 1,893 36.08% 5,246
Faulkner 26,218 65.54% 12,257 30.64% 1,526 3.81% 13,961 34.90% 40,001
Franklin 4,284 79.73% 892 16.60% 197 3.67% 3,392 63.13% 5,373
Fulton 3,119 78.60% 681 17.16% 168 4.23% 2,438 61.44% 3,968
Garland 22,606 68.60% 9,162 27.80% 1,186 3.60% 13,444 40.80% 32,954
Grant 5,205 82.91% 859 13.68% 214 3.41% 4,346 69.23% 6,278
Greene 9,050 78.65% 2,027 17.62% 429 3.73% 7,023 61.04% 11,506
Hempstead 3,338 72.00% 1,193 25.73% 105 2.26% 2,145 46.27% 4,636
Hot Spring 7,360 74.60% 2,139 21.68% 367 3.72% 5,221 52.92% 9,866
Howard 2,668 73.84% 861 23.83% 84 2.32% 1,807 50.01% 3,613
Independence 8,325 79.13% 1,839 17.48% 357 3.39% 6,486 61.65% 10,521
Izard 3,687 80.75% 721 15.79% 158 3.46% 2,966 64.96% 4,566
Jackson 2,913 72.61% 988 24.63% 111 2.77% 1,925 47.98% 4,012
Jefferson 7,570 43.97% 9,339 54.25% 307 1.78% -1,769 -10.28% 17,216
Johnson 5,287 75.67% 1,458 20.87% 242 3.46% 3,829 54.80% 6,987
Lafayette 1,281 65.49% 632 32.31% 43 2.20% 649 33.18% 1,956
Lawrence 3,692 80.68% 729 15.93% 155 3.39% 2,963 64.75% 4,576
Lee 978 49.20% 956 48.09% 54 2.72% 22 1.11% 1,988
Lincoln 2,040 74.64% 619 22.65% 74 2.71% 1,421 51.99% 2,733
Little River 2,879 75.98% 798 21.06% 112 2.96% 2,081 54.92% 3,789
Logan 4,920 79.00% 1,094 17.57% 214 3.44% 3,826 61.43% 6,228
Lonoke 17,007 76.14% 4,477 20.04% 852 3.81% 12,530 56.10% 22,336
Madison 4,489 77.73% 1,102 19.08% 184 3.19% 3,387 58.65% 5,775
Marion 4,766 79.65% 1,015 16.96% 203 3.39% 3,751 62.68% 5,984
Miller 8,475 75.78% 2,422 21.66% 286 2.56% 6,053 54.13% 11,183
Mississippi 5,430 63.87% 2,876 33.83% 195 2.29% 2,554 30.04% 8,501
Monroe 1,295 57.99% 891 39.90% 47 2.10% 404 18.09% 2,233
Montgomery 2,516 79.80% 532 16.87% 105 3.33% 1,984 62.92% 3,153
Nevada 1,667 67.87% 740 30.13% 49 2.00% 927 37.74% 2,456
Newton 2,440 79.74% 513 16.76% 107 3.50% 1,927 62.97% 3,060
Ouachita 4,163 59.52% 2,663 38.08% 168 2.40% 1,500 21.45% 6,994
Perry 2,919 76.98% 712 18.78% 161 4.25% 2,207 58.20% 3,792
Phillips 1,929 45.11% 2,281 53.34% 66 1.54% -352 -8.23% 4,276
Pike 3,133 84.61% 472 12.75% 98 2.65% 2,661 71.86% 3,703
Poinsett 4,419 79.64% 976 17.59% 154 2.78% 3,443 62.05% 5,549
Polk 5,669 82.59% 932 13.58% 263 3.83% 4,737 69.01% 6,864
Pope 13,158 75.39% 3,678 21.07% 618 3.54% 9,480 54.31% 17,454
Prairie 2,209 83.11% 386 14.52% 63 2.37% 1,823 68.59% 2,658
Pulaski 52,745 42.73% 67,503 54.69% 3,184 2.58% -14,758 -11.96% 123,432
Randolph 4,160 79.31% 864 16.47% 221 4.21% 3,296 62.84% 5,245
Saline 30,900 71.73% 10,602 24.61% 1,574 3.65% 20,298 47.12% 43,076
Scott 2,497 84.64% 349 11.83% 104 3.53% 2,148 72.81% 2,950
Searcy 2,523 81.10% 426 13.69% 162 5.21% 2,097 67.41% 3,111
Sebastian 24,097 70.32% 8,926 26.05% 1,246 3.64% 15,171 44.27% 34,269
Sevier 2,888 79.71% 625 17.25% 110 3.04% 2,263 62.46% 3,623
Sharp 4,848 80.45% 979 16.25% 199 3.30% 3,869 64.21% 6,026
St. Francis 2,514 49.89% 2,424 48.10% 101 2.00% 90 1.79% 5,039
Stone 3,949 77.94% 932 18.39% 186 3.67% 3,017 59.54% 5,067
Union 7,926 68.33% 3,443 29.68% 230 1.98% 4,483 38.65% 11,599
Van Buren 4,861 77.93% 1,111 17.81% 266 4.26% 3,750 60.12% 6,238
Washington 37,336 53.01% 30,935 43.92% 2,160 3.07% 6,401 9.09% 70,431
White 18,497 80.24% 3,732 16.19% 823 3.57% 14,765 64.05% 23,052
Woodruff 1,376 66.28% 633 30.49% 67 3.23% 743 35.79% 2,076
Yell 4,264 81.03% 836 15.89% 162 3.08% 3,428 65.15% 5,262
Totals592,43765.73%280,18731.09%28,6823.18%312,25034.64%901,306
Close

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

By congressional district

Boozman won all four congressional districts.[38]

More information District, Boozman ...
District Boozman James Representative
1st 72% 25% Rick Crawford
2nd 59% 38% French Hill
3rd 63% 33% Steve Womack
4th 70% 27% Bruce Westerman
Close

See also

Notes

  1. Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  2. Cates with 5%

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks