Draft:Andreas Huber

Andreas Huber
Native name	Huber Uhren
Company type	Private (Defunct)
Industry	Luxury goods; Watchmaking; Jewelry;
Founded	October 13, 1856; 169 years ago in Munich, Germany
Founder	Andreas Huber
Defunct	2002
Headquarters	Munich, Germany
Area served	Bavaria
Products	Watches; Clocks;
Parent	Bucherer (since 2002)

Andreas Huber (also Huber Watches) was a German watchmaker and luxury retail chain based in Munich, Germany. Founded in 1856 by Andreas Huber, the family business grew into an official supplier for the Royal Court of Bavaria. The company also served as the official timekeeper for the 1936 Winter Olympics.^[1] Andreas Huber ran independently until 2002, when the company was bought by the Swiss luxury retailer Bucherer.^[2]^[3]

Native name

Huber Uhren

Company type

Private (Defunct)

Industry

FoundedOctober 13, 1856; 169 years ago in Munich, Germany

Quick facts Native name, Company type ...

Close

Submission declined on 30 May 2026 by JohnLaurens333 (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by JohnLaurens333 16 days ago. Last edited by JohnLaurens333 16 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 20 May 2026 by EatingCarBatteries (talk).

This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Declined by EatingCarBatteries 27 days ago.

[1]

[2]

[3]

Draft:Andreas Huber

References

Related Articles